Literature DB >> 23539666

3.0 T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the liver: quantification of choline.

Li Xu1, Bo Liu, Yan Huang, Xian Liu, Si-Wei Zhang, Xue-Gang Xin, Jin-Zhi Zheng.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the normal hepatic magnetic resonance spectroscopy findings choline/lipid2 (Cho/Lip2) associated with age and body mass index (BMI).
METHODS: A total of 58 single-voxel proton spectra of the liver were acquired at 3.0 T using the eight-channel phased array abdominal coil as the receiver coil. Consecutive stacks of breath-hold spectra were acquired using the point resolved spectroscopy technique at a short echo time of 30 ms and a repetition time of 1500 ms. The spectra were processed with the SAGE software package. Areas and heights for metabolite resonance were obtained. Student's t test for unpaired data was used for comparisons of shimming, Cho/Lip2, and lipid content.
RESULTS: There were significant negative correlations between the Cho/Lip2 peak height ratios and BMI (r = -0.615) and age (r = -0.398) (all P < 0.01). Compared with the high-BMI group, the low-BMI group was younger (39.1 ± 13.0 years vs 47.6 ± 8.5 years, t = -2.954, P = 0.005); had better water suppression (93.4% ± 1.4% vs 85.6% ± 11.6%, t = 2.741, P = 0.014); had higher Cho/Lip2 peak heights ratio (0.2 ± 0.14 vs 0.05 ± 0.04, t = 6.033, P < 0.000); and had lower lipid content (0.03 ± 0.08 vs 0.29 ± 0.31, t = -3.309, P = 0.004). Compared with the older group, the younger group had better shimming effects (17.1 ± 3.6 Hz vs 22.0 ± 6.8 Hz, t = -2.919, P = 0.008); higher Cho/Lip2 peak heights ratios (0.03 ± 0.05 vs 0.09 ± 0.12, t = 2.4, P = 0.020); and lower lipid content (0.05 ± 0.11 vs 0.23 ± 0.32, t = -2.337, P = 0.031). Compared with the low-choline peak group, the high-choline peak group had lower lipid content (0.005 ± 0.002 vs 0.13 ± 0.23, t = -3.796, P < 0.000); lower BMI (19.6 ± 2.4 vs 23.9 ± 3.0, t = -4.410, P < 0.000); and younger age (34.7 ± 10.0 years vs 43.2 ± 12.5 years, t = -2.088, P = 0.041).
CONCLUSION: Lipid accumulation could result from the increased fat in the body depending on age and BMI. Lipid can mask the resonance signal of choline.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choline; High-field imaging; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23539666      PMCID: PMC3602508          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i9.1472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  26 in total

1.  Chronic hepatitis: in vivo proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of the liver and correlation with histopathologic findings.

Authors:  S G Cho; M Y Kim; H J Kim; Y S Kim; W Choi; S H Shin; K C Hong; Y B Kim; J H Lee; C H Suh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A feasibility study of quantitative molecular characterization of musculoskeletal lesions by proton MR spectroscopy at 3 T.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Xin Wang; Nouha Salibi; Peter B Barker; Michael A Jacobs; Antonio J Machado; Kristy L Weber; David A Bluemke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Neurological diagnoses in the emergency room: differences between younger and older patients.

Authors:  Marcos C Lange; Vera L Braatz; Carolina Tomiyoshi; Felipe M Nóvak; Artur F Fernandes; Laura N Zamproni; Elcio J Piovesan; Edison M Nóvak; Helio A G Teive; Lineu C Werneck
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.420

4.  Effects of contrast agent on water suppression and shimming of kidney single-volume proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0T.

Authors:  Li Xu; Chang-Hong Liang; Biao Huang; Shao-Heng Tan; Dongzhi Cen; Yan-Hai Cui; Yuan-Qiu Xiao
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: quantitative assessment of liver fat content by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Liang Zhong; Jie Jun Chen; Jie Chen; Lei Li; Zhi Qian Lin; Wen Jing Wang; Jian Rong Xu
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.325

6.  Breathhold abdominal and thoracic proton MR spectroscopy at 3T.

Authors:  Rachel Katz-Brull; Neil M Rofsky; Robert E Lenkinski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of large focal hepatic lesions and metabolite change of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using 3.0-T MR scanner.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Kuo; Chun-Wei Li; Chao-Yun Chen; Jochi Jao; Ding-Kwo Wu; Gin-Chang Liu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Parametric exploration of the liver by magnetic resonance methods.

Authors:  Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Hepatic lipid profiling in chronic hepatitis C: an in vitro and in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Jeremy F L Cobbold; Jaymin H Patel; Robert D Goldin; Bernard V North; Mary M E Crossey; Julie Fitzpatrick; Marzena Wylezinska; Howard C Thomas; I Jane Cox; Simon D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  In vivo quantification of choline compounds in the breast with 1H MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Patrick J Bolan; Sina Meisamy; Eva H Baker; Joseph Lin; Timothy Emory; Michael Nelson; Lenore I Everson; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  5 in total

1.  1H-MRS evaluation of breast lesions by using total choline signal-to-noise ratio as an indicator of malignancy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Xiang Jiang Wang; Hui Sheng Song; Long Hua Chen
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in oncology: the fingerprints of cancer?

Authors:  Roberto García-Figueiras; Sandra Baleato-González; Anwar R Padhani; Laura Oleaga; Joan C Vilanova; Antonio Luna; Juan Carlos Cobas Gómez
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  Multiparametric MR Imaging in Abdominal Malignancies.

Authors:  Antonio Luna; Shivani Pahwa; Claudio Bonini; Lidia Alcalá-Mata; Katherine L Wright; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Predicts Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Subset of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Yuehua Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Quantitative study of liver magnetic resonance spectroscopy quality at 3T using body and phased array coils with physical analysis and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Li Xu; Shiyong Gu; Qianjin Feng; Changhong Liang; Sherman Xuegang Xin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.