OBJECTIVE: Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) is gaining acceptance as a noninvasive technique for assessment of hepatic steatosis, and the findings have been found to correlate closely with histopathologic grade. The aims of this study were to validate (1)H-MRS performed with a 3-T MRI system for quantifying hepatic steatosis and to determine threshold values of (1)H-MRS proton density fat fraction corresponding to standard histopathologic grade in patients undergoing diagnostic liver biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional liver MRS study with 52 subjects undergoing diagnostic liver biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of (1)H-MRS was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of (1)H-MRS for hepatic steatosis was high with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-1.0). Results were similar for three (1)H-MRS measurements obtained at different locations in the liver, for two independent pathologists, and whether fibrosis was present or absent. One third of participants had elevated transaminase concentrations of unknown cause, and (1)H-MRS estimates of steatosis had perfect agreement with histopathologic grade in this group. Calculated (1)H-MRS proton density fat fraction thresholds for histologic grades were less than 17% for grade 0 or trace steatosis, 17-38.6% for grade 1, and greater than 38.6% for grade 2 or higher. CONCLUSION: Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy is an effective, noninvasive technique that can be used to diagnose and quantify hepatic steatosis. Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy thresholds corresponded with histopathologic grades and may be useful in the workup of patients with elevated transaminase concentrations.
OBJECTIVE:Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) is gaining acceptance as a noninvasive technique for assessment of hepatic steatosis, and the findings have been found to correlate closely with histopathologic grade. The aims of this study were to validate (1)H-MRS performed with a 3-T MRI system for quantifying hepatic steatosis and to determine threshold values of (1)H-MRS proton density fat fraction corresponding to standard histopathologic grade in patients undergoing diagnostic liver biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional liver MRS study with 52 subjects undergoing diagnostic liver biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of (1)H-MRS was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of (1)H-MRS for hepatic steatosis was high with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-1.0). Results were similar for three (1)H-MRS measurements obtained at different locations in the liver, for two independent pathologists, and whether fibrosis was present or absent. One third of participants had elevated transaminase concentrations of unknown cause, and (1)H-MRS estimates of steatosis had perfect agreement with histopathologic grade in this group. Calculated (1)H-MRS proton density fat fraction thresholds for histologic grades were less than 17% for grade 0 or trace steatosis, 17-38.6% for grade 1, and greater than 38.6% for grade 2 or higher. CONCLUSION:Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy is an effective, noninvasive technique that can be used to diagnose and quantify hepatic steatosis. Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy thresholds corresponded with histopathologic grades and may be useful in the workup of patients with elevated transaminase concentrations.
Authors: Lidia S Szczepaniak; Pamela Nurenberg; David Leonard; Jeffrey D Browning; Jason S Reingold; Scott Grundy; Helen H Hobbs; Robert L Dobbins Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-08-31 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: R Longo; P Pollesello; C Ricci; F Masutti; B J Kvam; L Bercich; L S Crocè; P Grigolato; S Paoletti; B de Bernard Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1995 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Gaspard d'Assignies; Martin Ruel; Abdesslem Khiat; Luigi Lepanto; Miguel Chagnon; Claude Kauffmann; An Tang; Louis Gaboury; Yvan Boulanger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-03-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: R G Knodell; K G Ishak; W C Black; T S Chen; R Craig; N Kaplowitz; T W Kiernan; J Wollman Journal: Hepatology Date: 1981 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Takara L Stanley; Lindsay T Fourman; Meghan N Feldpausch; Julia Purdy; Isabel Zheng; Chelsea S Pan; Julia Aepfelbacher; Colleen Buckless; Andrew Tsao; Anela Kellogg; Karen Branch; Hang Lee; Chia-Ying Liu; Kathleen E Corey; Raymond T Chung; Martin Torriani; David E Kleiner; Colleen M Hadigan; Steven K Grinspoon Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Laurie R Braun; Meghan N Feldpausch; Natalia Czerwonka; Julian Weiss; Karen Branch; Hang Lee; Edgar L Martinez-Salazar; Martin Torriani; Craig A Sponseller; Steven K Grinspoon; Takara L Stanley Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Laurie R Braun; Meghan N Feldpausch; Natalia Czerwonka; Martin Torriani; Steven K Grinspoon; Takara L Stanley Journal: Growth Horm IGF Res Date: 2017-10-07 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Lindsay Matthews; David E Kleiner; Cheryl Chairez; Maryellen McManus; Mary Jane Nettles; Kira Zemanick; Caryn Gee Morse; Debra Benator; Joseph A Kovacs; Colleen Hadigan Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Takara L Stanley; Meghan N Feldpausch; Jinhee Oh; Karen L Branch; Hang Lee; Martin Torriani; Steven K Grinspoon Journal: JAMA Date: 2014 Jul 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272