OBJECT: Among several non-invasive methods of liver fat analysis, the most important role is played by MR imaging and spectroscopy (MRS). This study describes the 1H MRS at 3T measurement of liver fat volume fraction Φ(fat) in a group of liver transplant patients, an at-risk group for the development of de novo steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven liver transplant recipients who underwent routine protocolar posttransplant examination were divided into three groups: CON-PAT (control group for the cross validation test, 48 patients), PAT-PAT (patients test group for the cross validation test, 29 patients), and PAT (pooled data). Single voxel 1H MRS at 3T was used for the determination of Φ(fat) and histology results (His) were used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Linear and non-linear regression models were used to describe the relationship between Φ(fat) and His. Strong correlation was found for both models with r = 0.83-0.94 (P < 0.001); a higher r was found for non-linear regression in all tested groups. Areas under receiver operation curves were calculated for cut points His ≥ 5 and > 33% and were found in the range of 0.77-0.86. Fibrosis influences the calculation of Φ(fat) and different slopes were obtained for fibrosis stages F0-F1 and F2-F3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant correlation was found between the results of histology and 1H MRS measurement of liver fat content. The method is suitable for non-invasive repetitive examination of liver fat in liver-transplants patients between protocol biopsies and for the screening of steatosis in other liver diseases.
OBJECT: Among several non-invasive methods of liver fat analysis, the most important role is played by MR imaging and spectroscopy (MRS). This study describes the 1H MRS at 3T measurement of liver fat volume fraction Φ(fat) in a group of liver transplant patients, an at-risk group for the development of de novo steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven liver transplant recipients who underwent routine protocolar posttransplant examination were divided into three groups: CON-PAT (control group for the cross validation test, 48 patients), PAT-PAT (patients test group for the cross validation test, 29 patients), and PAT (pooled data). Single voxel 1H MRS at 3T was used for the determination of Φ(fat) and histology results (His) were used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Linear and non-linear regression models were used to describe the relationship between Φ(fat) and His. Strong correlation was found for both models with r = 0.83-0.94 (P < 0.001); a higher r was found for non-linear regression in all tested groups. Areas under receiver operation curves were calculated for cut points His ≥ 5 and > 33% and were found in the range of 0.77-0.86. Fibrosis influences the calculation of Φ(fat) and different slopes were obtained for fibrosis stages F0-F1 and F2-F3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant correlation was found between the results of histology and 1H MRS measurement of liver fat content. The method is suitable for non-invasive repetitive examination of liver fat in liver-transplants patients between protocol biopsies and for the screening of steatosis in other liver diseases.
Authors: Jochem R van Werven; Johannes M Hoogduin; Aart J Nederveen; Andre A van Vliet; Ewa Wajs; Petra Vandenberk; Erik S G Stroes; Jaap Stoker Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Vlad Ratziu; Luminita Bonyhay; Vincent Di Martino; Frederic Charlotte; Lucas Cavallaro; Marie-Hélène Sayegh-Tainturier; Philippe Giral; André Grimaldi; Pierre Opolon; Thierry Poynard Journal: Hepatology Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: R J Ploeg; A M D'Alessandro; S J Knechtle; M D Stegall; J D Pirsch; R M Hoffmann; T Sasaki; H W Sollinger; F O Belzer; M Kalayoglu Journal: Transplantation Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jing Qi; Yuman Fong; Leonard Saltz; Michael I D'Angelica; Nancy E Kemeny; Mithat Gonen; Jinru Shia; Amita Shukla-Dave; William R Jarnagin; William M Jarnagin; Richard K G Do; Lawrence H Schwartz; Jason A Koutcher; Kristen L Zakian Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Stefan Traussnigg; Christian Kienbacher; Martin Gajdošík; Ladislav Valkovič; Emina Halilbasic; Judith Stift; Christian Rechling; Harald Hofer; Petra Steindl-Munda; Peter Ferenci; Fritz Wrba; Siegfried Trattnig; Martin Krššák; Michael Trauner Journal: Liver Int Date: 2017-05-20 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Václav Šmíd; Karel Dvořák; Petr Šedivý; Vít Kosek; Martin Leníček; Monika Dezortová; Jana Hajšlová; Milan Hájek; Libor Vítek; Kamila Bechyňská; Radan Brůha Journal: Hepatol Commun Date: 2022-02-11