Literature DB >> 19626175

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment.

Claudius Thomé, Wolfgang Börm, Frerk Meyer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although the aging of the population is causing a dramatic rise in the incidence of lumbar spinal stenosis, the indications and options for surgical treatment are not clearly defined.
METHODS: In an attempt to aid clinical decision making, a selective literature review was conducted, taking into account the guidelines of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF).
RESULTS: In degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis hypertrophy of the facet joints and yellow ligaments brings about constriction of the spinal canal, leading to back pain and activity-dependent lower limb symptoms (neurogenic claudication). If conservative treatment fails, an imaging study, usually magnetic resonance imaging, is required. In the case of severe symptoms the progressive underlying degeneration necessitates surgical treatment. Minimally invasive fenestration techniques are usually employed to decompress the spinal canal; in the presence of instability, fusion is indicated. DISCUSSION: Despite the proven superiority of surgery in the management of refractory lumbar spinal stenosis, there is a lack of evidence-based data regarding the different surgical treatment options. The evaluation of modern, minimally invasive techniques is thus difficult.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fenestration; fusion; laminectomy; lumbar spinal stenosis; neurogenic claudication; surgery

Year:  2008        PMID: 19626175      PMCID: PMC2696879          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  22 in total

1.  Effectiveness of salmon calcitonin nasal spray in the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial.

Authors:  Vinod K Podichetty; Allen M Segal; Michael Lieber; Daniel J Mazanec
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Is spinal stenosis better treated surgically or nonsurgically?

Authors:  Aravind Athiviraham; David Yen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part I: lumbar spine.

Authors:  Zareth N Irwin; Alan Hilibrand; Michael Gustavel; Robert McLain; William Shaffer; Mark Myers; John Glaser; Robert A Hart
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.

Authors:  James F Zucherman; Ken Y Hsu; Charles A Hartjen; Thomas F Mehalic; Dante A Implicito; Michael J Martin; Donald R Johnson; Grant A Skidmore; Paul P Vessa; James W Dwyer; Stephen T Puccio; Joseph C Cauthen; Richard M Ozuna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  R W Porter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Daniel K Resnick; Tanvir F Choudhri; Andrew T Dailey; Michael W Groff; Larry Khoo; Paul G Matz; Praveen Mummaneni; William C Watters; Jeffrey Wang; Beverly C Walters; Mark N Hadley
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-06

8.  Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Klaus John Schnake; Stefan Schaeren; Bernard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations.

Authors:  M A Ciol; R A Deyo; E Howell; S Kreif
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  K Anthony Kim; Matthew McDonald; Justin H T Pik; Paul Khoueir; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

View more
  22 in total

1.  [Interspinous spacers--technique of Coflex™ implantation].

Authors:  Jens A Richolt; Michael A Rauschmann; Sven Schmidt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  [Spinal canal stenosis].

Authors:  P Papanagiotou; M Boutchakova
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Operative treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine].

Authors:  M Czabanka; C Thomé; F Ringel; B Meyer; S-O Eicker; V Rohde; M Stoffel; P Vajkoczy
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  [Diagnostics and conservative treatment of cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  A Hug; S Hähnel; N Weidner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Is sequestrectomy a viable alternative to microdiscectomy? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Bahram Fakouri; Nitin R Shetty; Thomas C H White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Surgical training in spine surgery: safety and patient-rated outcome.

Authors:  Guy Waisbrod; Anne F Mannion; Támas F Fekete; Frank Kleinstueck; Deszö Jeszenszky; Daniel Haschtmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in older people: current treatment options.

Authors:  Rolf Kalff; Christian Ewald; Albrecht Waschke; Lars Gobisch; Christof Hopf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Internal morphology of human facet joints: comparing cervical and lumbar spine with regard to age, gender and the vertebral core.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Daniel Zanker; Uwe Wolfram
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  [Hybrid stabilization technique with spinal fusion and interlaminar device to reduce the length of fusion and to protect symptomatic adjacent segments : Clinical long-term follow-up].

Authors:  C Fleege; M Rickert; I Werner; M Rauschmann; M Arabmotlagh
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Additional decompression at adjacent segments leads to adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF.

Authors:  Masayuki Miyagi; Osamu Ikeda; Seiji Ohtori; Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi; Yukio Someya; Masataka Shibayama; Yasufumi Ogawa; Gen Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Hiroto Kamoda; Gen Arai; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Yasuchika Aoki; Tomoaki Toyone; Toshio Ooi; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.