Literature DB >> 16205348

Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part I: lumbar spine.

Zareth N Irwin1, Alan Hilibrand, Michael Gustavel, Robert McLain, William Shaffer, Mark Myers, John Glaser, Robert A Hart.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Survey-based descriptive study.
OBJECTIVE: To study relationships between surgeon-specific factors and surgical approach to degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Geographic variations in the rates of lumbar spine surgery are significant within the United States. Although surgeon density correlates with the rates of spine surgery, other reasons for variation such as surgeon age and training background are poorly understood.
METHODS: A total of 22 orthopedic surgeons and 8 neurosurgeons of varied ages and geographic regions answered questions regarding the need for surgery, surgical approach, and use of fusion and instrumentation for 5 simulated cases. Cases included: (1) multilevel stenosis without deformity or instability, (2) degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis, (3) isthmic (spondylolytic) spondylolisthesis with foraminal stenosis, (4) degenerative scoliosis with stenosis, and (5) recurrent stenosis following prior laminectomy without deformity or instability. The effects of surgeon age and training background on surgical decision making were analyzed using an independent samples t test and Fisher exact test, respectively.
RESULTS: Significant variation in treatment approach among surgeons was noted for all cases except the patient with lytic spondylolisthesis, for whom all surgeons recommended fusion. Orthopedists recommended fusion and instrumentation more often than neurosurgeons for all cases, reaching significance for degenerative scoliosis with stenosis (P = 0.02 for both fusion and instrumentation). Younger surgeons were generally more likely to recommend instrumentation than their older peers, reaching significance for multilevel stenosis without deformity or instability and recurrent stenosis following prior laminectomy without deformity or instability (P = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Variations in surgical approach to lumbar degenerative diseases may depend on a patient's clinical condition. This study found strong agreement in the approach to lytic spondylolisthesis but significant variation for other degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. In addition, recommendation for fusion and instrumentation varied with surgeon age and training background. Previously documented geographic variations may result in part from a lack of consensus on appropriate treatment techniques for specific lumbar degenerative conditions, as well as surgeon-specific factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16205348     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000181057.60012.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Marek Szpalski; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Minimally invasive laminectomy in spondylolisthetic lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Ilias N Caralopoulos; Cuong J Bui
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Rational decision making in a wide scenario of different minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion approaches and devices.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Antoine Tohmeh; David Jones; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Leonardo Oliveira; Bruce C Pittman; Hyun Bae
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

4.  United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Patrick R Olson; Kristen K Bronner; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Wolfgang Börm; Frerk Meyer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  The who, what and when of surgery for the degenerative lumbar spine: a population-based study of surgeon factors, surgical procedures, recent trends and reoperation rates.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Hans J Kreder; Iris Weller; Joel A Finkelstein; Michael H Ford; Albert J M Yee
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Improving spine surgical access, appropriateness and efficiency in metropolitan, urban and rural settings.

Authors:  Mohammad Zarrabian; Andrew Bidos; Caroline Fanti; Barry Young; Brian Drew; David Puskas; Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Interspinous spacers compared with decompression or fusion for lumbar stenosis: complications and repeat operations in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Brook I Martin; Alex Ching; Anna N A Tosteson; Jeffrey G Jarvik; William Kreuter; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Geographic variation in epidural steroid injection use in medicare patients.

Authors:  Janna Friedly; Leighton Chan; Richard Deyo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Determinants of surgical decision making: a national survey.

Authors:  Niamey P Wilson; Francis P Wilson; Mark Neuman; Andrew Epstein; Richard Bell; Katrina Armstrong; Kenric Murayama
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.