Literature DB >> 21153011

[Interspinous spacers--technique of Coflex™ implantation].

Jens A Richolt1, Michael A Rauschmann, Sven Schmidt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This surgical procedure addresses the reduction of spinal stenoses as a short-term result. In the long run, prevention of recurrent narrowing of the spinal canal and the development of sciatic pain is the goal by taking load from the facet joint and indirect extension of the neuroforamina. This is achieved by interspinous distraction of the described spacer. In addition, this implant leads to a dynamic limitation of a spinal motion segment. INDICATIONS: Spinal stenosis in conjunction with moderate spondylarthrosis without signs of spondylolisthesis (> Meyerding 1°). Other indications are revisions after nucleotomies and primary nucleotomies in cases of massive disk hernia. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Segmental instabilities (degeneration or spondylolisthesis), advanced spondylarthrosis, dysraphia of the vertebral arc, scoliosis at the segment to treat, significant osteoporosis, tumor, infection. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Interlaminar decompression and implantation of an interspinous spacer. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Mobilization not before 2 h postoperatively. Wound drain removal after approximately 24 h. In case of treatment of more than one segment as as well as in cases of revision and obesity, a lumbar orthesis for 6 weeks is recommended. Physiotherapy to improve active lumbar stabilization especially by isometric exercises. Lifting of heavy loads (> 5 kg) and extensive flexion should be avoided.
RESULTS: So far, inconsistent results in currently available retrospective studies. Comparable short-term results in prospective studies of sole decompression without implantation of an interspinous spacer. Prospective randomized comparative studies are not yet available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153011     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-9029-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  10 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic interspinous process technology.

Authors:  Sean D Christie; John K Song; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kai-Jow Tsai; Hideki Murakami; Gary L Lowery; William C Hutton
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2006

3.  Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea.

Authors:  A Kettler; J Drumm; F Heuer; K Haeussler; C Mack; L Claes; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Wolfgang Börm; Frerk Meyer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; J Drumm; K Häussler; C Mack; W-I Steudel; A Kettler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R B Keller; D Robson; R A Deyo; D E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  [Lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; M Schneider; B Marquardt; U Liljenqvist; T A Pietilä; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.

Authors:  James F Zucherman; Ken Y Hsu; Charles A Hartjen; Thomas F Mehalic; Dante A Implicito; Michael J Martin; Donald R Johnson; Grant A Skidmore; Paul P Vessa; James W Dwyer; Stephen T Puccio; Joseph C Cauthen; Richard M Ozuna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; Leonard I Voronov; Ioannis N Gaitanis; Gerard Carandang; Robert M Havey; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 10.  Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  A J Caputy; A J Luessenhop
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.115

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.