Literature DB >> 19625483

BD Phoenix and Vitek 2 detection of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus with cefoxitin.

Alan D Junkins1, Shawn R Lockhart, Kristopher P Heilmann, Cassie L Dohrn, Diana L Von Stein, Patricia L Winokur, Gary V Doern, Sandra S Richter.   

Abstract

The BD Phoenix (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD) and Vitek 2 (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) automated susceptibility testing systems have implemented the use of cefoxitin to enhance the detection of methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). To assess the impact of this change, 620 clinically significant S. aureus isolates were tested in parallel on Phoenix PMIC/ID-102 panels and Vitek 2 AST-GP66 cards. The results for oxacillin and cefoxitin generated by the automated systems were compared to those generated by two reference methods: mecA gene detection and MICs of oxacillin previously determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines. Testing of isolates with discordant results was repeated to attain a majority or consensus final result. There was 100% final agreement between the results of the two reference methods. For the 448 MRSA and 172 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates tested, the rates of categorical agreement of the results obtained with the automated systems with those obtained by the reference methods were 99.8% for the Phoenix panels and 99.7% for the Vitek 2 cards. A single very major error occurred on each instrument (0.2%) with different MRSA isolates. The only major error was attributed to the Vitek 2 system overcalling oxacillin resistance. In 16 instances (9 on the Phoenix system, 7 on the Vitek 2 system), an oxacillin MIC in the susceptible range was correctly changed to resistant by the expert system on the basis of the cefoxitin result. The inclusion of cefoxitin in the Phoenix and Vitek 2 panels has optimized the detection of MRSA by both systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625483      PMCID: PMC2738126          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01109-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Duarte C Oliveira; Hermínia de Lencastre
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin (oxacillin) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  David Velasco; Maria del Mar Tomas; Monica Cartelle; Alejandro Beceiro; Astrid Perez; Francisca Molina; Rita Moure; Rosa Villanueva; German Bou
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of susceptibility testing methods and analysis of mecA-positive susceptible strains.

Authors:  G Sakoulas; H S Gold; L Venkataraman; P C DeGirolami; G M Eliopoulos; Q Qian
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Transcription of the gene mediating methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (mecA) is corepressed but not coinduced by cognate mecA and beta-lactamase regulators.

Authors:  T K McKinney; V K Sharma; W A Craig; G L Archer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Cefoxitin resistance as a surrogate marker for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Clarence J Fernandes; Lorna A Fernandes; Peter Collignon
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Evaluation of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 microg) for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B Cauwelier; B Gordts; P Descheemaecker; H Van Landuyt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.

Authors:  Annie Felten; Bernadette Grandry; Philippe Henri Lagrange; Isabelle Casin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Identification of methicillin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci responsible for bloodstream infections with the Phoenix system.

Authors:  Teresa Spanu; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Daniela Ciccaglione; Lucio Romano; Fiammetta Leone; Patrizia Mazzella; Giovanni Fadda
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 9.  Factors influencing methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  Brigitte Berger-Bächi; Susanne Rohrer
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Evaluation of new Vitek 2 card and disk diffusion method for determining susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin.

Authors:  Sandrine Roisin; Claire Nonhoff; Olivier Denis; Marc J Struelens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Expert systems in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Trevor Winstanley; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparison of Automated Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Systems To Detect mecC-Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Camille Kolenda; Céline Dupieux; Jean-Winoc Decousser; Anders Rhod Larsen; Bruno Pichon; Mark Holmes; Michèle Bès; Christopher Teale; Elizabeth Dickson; Robert Hill; Robert Skov; Angela Kearns; Frédéric Laurent
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Performance of a New MicroScan WalkAway PC30 panel and disk diffusion method for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  Olivier Gallon; Patrick Pina; Alain Gravet; Frederic Laurent; Brigitte Lamy; Jean-Marie Delarbre; F Doucet-Populaire; J W Decousser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Performance Evaluation of the Quantamatrix QMAC-dRAST System for Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Directly from Blood Cultures.

Authors:  Manon Rosselin; Guy Prod'hom; Gilbert Greub; Antony Croxatto
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-14

5.  Performance of Vitek 2 for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp.

Authors:  April M Bobenchik; Janet A Hindler; Carmen L Giltner; Sandra Saeki; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Innovative and rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems.

Authors:  Alex van Belkum; Carey-Ann D Burnham; John W A Rossen; Frederic Mallard; Olivier Rochas; William Michael Dunne
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 60.633

7.  Antibacterial Fractions from Erodium cicutarium Exposed-Clinical Strains of Staphylococcus aureus in Focus.

Authors:  Vanja Ljoljić Bilić; Uroš M Gašić; Dušanka Milojković-Opsenica; Hrvoje Rimac; Jadranka Vuković Rodriguez; Josipa Vlainić; Diana Brlek-Gorski; Ivan Kosalec
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06

8.  Comparative Performances of Vitek-2, Disk Diffusion, and Broth Microdilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.

Authors:  Elisa Rampacci; Michele Trotta; Caterina Fani; Serenella Silvestri; Valentina Stefanetti; Chiara Brachelente; Antonella Mencacci; Fabrizio Passamonti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Nanomotion Detection-Based Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Sandor Kasas; Anton Malovichko; Maria Ines Villalba; María Elena Vela; Osvaldo Yantorno; Ronnie G Willaert
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.