Literature DB >> 15112072

Evaluation of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 microg) for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

B Cauwelier1, B Gordts, P Descheemaecker, H Van Landuyt.   

Abstract

The emergence of heterogeneous populations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes major problems in routine screening for MRSA. In heterogeneous MRSA populations, a proportion of bacterial cells show low-level resistance to oxacillin, with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of oxacillin ranging between 1 and 100 mg/l, while in homogeneous MRSA populations, the MIC of oxacillin for all cells is >100 mg/l. Routine oxacillin disk diffusion tests often fail to detect heterogeneous MRSA populations. In the present study, a recently proposed disk diffusion method that employs a cephamycin antibiotic (cefoxitin 30 microg; BD Sensi-disc, Becton Dickinson, Germany) was evaluated using 155 clinical isolates of S. aureus (73 mecA positive and 82 mecA negative). The results were compared with those of other MRSA screening techniques: a disk diffusion test with oxacillin 1 microg and cefoxitin 30 microg (BD Sensi-disc; Becton Dickinson), an MRSA latex agglutination test (Denka Seiken, Japan), and an oxacillin screen agar test (6 microg/ml; Becton Dickinson). Detection of the mecA gene by polymerase chain reaction was considered the gold standard. The performances of the different methods were determined and compared. The results showed that the cefoxitin disk diffusion test is preferable to the oxacillin disk diffusion method for routine screening to detect MRSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15112072     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-004-1130-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  8 in total

1.  From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus--Minnesota and North Dakota, 1997-1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk.

Authors:  B C Herold; L C Immergluck; M C Maranan; D S Lauderdale; R E Gaskin; S Boyle-Vavra; C D Leitch; R S Daum
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Cavassini; A Wenger; K Jaton; D S Blanc; J Bille
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitalized adults and children without known risk factors.

Authors:  E J Gorak; S M Yamada; J D Brown
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Detection of the mec-A gene and phenotypic detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline or low-level methicillinresistance.

Authors:  G E Bignardi; N Woodford; A Chapman; A P Johnson; D C Speller
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.

Authors:  Annie Felten; Bernadette Grandry; Philippe Henri Lagrange; Isabelle Casin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Effect of temperature on the in vitro susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; J Q Caruthers; C N Baker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Factors influencing methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  Brigitte Berger-Bächi; Susanne Rohrer
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 2.552

  8 in total
  24 in total

1.  Cefoxitin does not induce production of penicillin binding protein 2a in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  Ana Lúcia da Costa Darini; Izabel Cristina Vanzato Palazzo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Identification and Discrimination of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Burn Wound Sites Using PCR and Authentication with MALDI-TOF-MS.

Authors:  E Madhava Charyulu; Arumugam Gnanamani; A B Mandal
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Comments on use of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 microg) to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S C Arya; S Kapoor; N Agarwal; R Bhasin; S George
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Is the cefoxitin disk test reliable enough to detect oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci?

Authors:  Eliete A M Frigatto; Antonia M O Machado; Antônio C C Pignatari; Ana C Gales
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of different methods to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and their clinical laboratory utility.

Authors:  G Boşgelmez-Tinaz; S Ulusoy; B Aridoğan; F Coşkun-Ari
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Rationale for eliminating Staphylococcus breakpoints for β-lactam agents other than penicillin, oxacillin or cefoxitin, and ceftaroline.

Authors:  Jennifer Dien Bard; Janet A Hindler; Howard S Gold; Brandi Limbago
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Evaluation of the TPX MRSA assay for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T Stenholm; A J Hakanen; S Salmenlinna; S Pihlasalo; H Härmä; P E Hänninen; P Huovinen; J Vuopio; P Kotilainen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Inducible clindamycin resistance and nasal carriage rates of Staphylococcus aureus among healthcare workers and community members.

Authors:  Alaa M Mahmoud; Hanaa S Albadawy; Samira M Bolis; Naser E Bilal; Abdalla O Ahmed; Mutasim E Ibrahim
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.927

9.  Disk Diffusion Testing for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci: Does Moxalactam Improve upon Cefoxitin?

Authors:  Marie Bonjean; Elisabeth Hodille; Oana Dumitrescu; Céline Dupieux; Christina Nkoud Mongo; Camille Allam; Mathilde Beghin; Mickael Paris; Ophelie Borrel; Hubert Chardon; Fréderic Laurent; Jean-Philippe Rasigade; Gerard Lina
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  BD Phoenix and Vitek 2 detection of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus with cefoxitin.

Authors:  Alan D Junkins; Shawn R Lockhart; Kristopher P Heilmann; Cassie L Dohrn; Diana L Von Stein; Patricia L Winokur; Gary V Doern; Sandra S Richter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.