Literature DB >> 25747719

A classroom-based physical activity intervention for urban kindergarten and first-grade students: a feasibility study.

Marina Reznik1, Judith Wylie-Rosett2, Mimi Kim2, Philip O Ozuah3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urban elementary schools in minority communities with high obesity prevalence may have limited resources for physical education (PE) to achieve daily activity recommendations. Little is known whether integrating physical activity (PA) into classrooms can increase activity levels of students attending such schools.
METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized, controlled trial among kindergarten and first-grade students from four Bronx, New York, schools to determine feasibility and impact of a classroom-based intervention on students' PA levels. Students in two intervention schools received the Children's Hospital at Montefiore Joining Academics and Movement (CHAM JAM), an audio CD consisting of 10-minute, education-focused aerobic activities led by teachers three times a day. PA was objectively measured by pedometer. Each subject wore a sealed pedometer during the 6-hour school day for 5 consecutive days at baseline (Time 1) and 8 weeks postintervention (Time 2). Hierarchical linear models were fit to evaluate differences in mean number of steps between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 988 students participated (intervention group, n=500; control group, n=488). There was no significant difference at baseline between the two groups on mean number of steps (2581 [standard deviation (SD), 1284] vs. 2476 [SD, 1180]; P=0.71). Eight weeks post-CHAM JAM, intervention group students took significantly greater mean number of steps than controls (2839 [SD, 1262] vs. 2545 [SD, 1153]; P=0.0048) after adjusting for baseline number of steps and other covariates (grade, gender, recess, and PE class). CHAM JAM was equally effective in gender, grade level, and BMI subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: CHAM JAM significantly increased school-based PA among kindergarten and first-grade students in inner-city schools. This approach holds promise as a cost-effective means to integrate the physical and cognitive benefits of PA into high-risk schools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25747719      PMCID: PMC4485880          DOI: 10.1089/chi.2014.0090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Obes        ISSN: 2153-2168            Impact factor:   2.992


  42 in total

1.  CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials.

Authors:  Marion K Campbell; Diana R Elbourne; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-20

Review 2.  Classroom-based physical activity, cognition, and academic achievement.

Authors:  Joseph E Donnelly; Kate Lambourne
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Putting physical activity where it fits in the school day: preliminary results of the ABC (Activity Bursts in the Classroom) for fitness program.

Authors:  David L Katz; Daniel Cushman; Jesse Reynolds; Valentine Njike; Judith A Treu; Jennifer Walker; Erica Smith; Catherine Katz
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Robert P Pangrazi; Charles B Corbin; William J Rutherford; Susan D Vincent; Anders Raustorp; L Michaud Tomson; Thomas F Cuddihy
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Physical activity during school in urban minority kindergarten and first-grade students.

Authors:  Marina Reznik; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Mimi Kim; Philip O Ozuah
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  But I like PE: factors associated with enjoyment of physical education class in middle school girls.

Authors:  Daheia J Barr-Anderson; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Kathryn H Schmitz; Dianne S Ward; Terry L Conway; Charlotte Pratt; Chris D Baggett; Leslie Lytle; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Improving the fitness and physical activity levels of primary school children: results of the Fit-4-Fun group randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Narelle Eather; Philip J Morgan; David R Lubans
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study).

Authors:  Lars Bo Andersen; Maarike Harro; Luis B Sardinha; Karsten Froberg; Ulf Ekelund; Søren Brage; Sigmund Alfred Anderssen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Physical activity across the curriculum: year one process evaluation results.

Authors:  Cheryl A Gibson; Bryan K Smith; Katrina D Dubose; J Leon Greene; Bruce W Bailey; Shannon L Williams; Joseph J Ryan; Kristin H Schmelzle; Richard A Washburn; Debra K Sullivan; Matthew S Mayo; Joseph E Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  7 in total

1.  Parental Perspectives of Barriers to Physical Activity in Urban Schoolchildren With Asthma.

Authors:  Amy Kornblit; Agnieszka Cain; Laurie J Bauman; Nicole M Brown; Marina Reznik
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 2.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Hilary Caldwell; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-23

3.  Introducing physically active lessons in UK secondary schools: feasibility study and pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Catherine Gammon; Katie Morton; Andrew Atkin; Kirsten Corder; Andy Daly-Smith; Thomas Quarmby; Marc Suhrcke; David Turner; Esther van Sluijs
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  School-related sedentary behaviours and indicators of health and well-being among children and youth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas Kuzik; Bruno G G da Costa; Yeongho Hwang; Simone J J M Verswijveren; Scott Rollo; Mark S Tremblay; Stacey Bélanger; Valerie Carson; Melanie Davis; Susan Hornby; Wendy Yajun Huang; Barbi Law; Jo Salmon; Jennifer R Tomasone; Lucy-Joy Wachira; Katrien Wijndaele; Travis J Saunders
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  A systematic review of the use and reporting of evaluation frameworks within evaluations of physical activity interventions.

Authors:  Judith F Fynn; Wendy Hardeman; Karen Milton; Joseph Murphy; Andy Jones
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Statistical methods to model and evaluate physical activity programs, using step counts: A systematic review.

Authors:  S S M Silva; Madawa W Jayawardana; Denny Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis Resulting in a Typology of Elementary Classroom Movement Integration Interventions.

Authors:  Spyridoula Vazou; Collin A Webster; Gregory Stewart; Priscila Candal; Cate A Egan; Adam Pennell; Laura B Russ
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2020-01-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.