Literature DB >> 1929029

Cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the elderly.

J L Wagner1, R C Herdman, S Wadhwa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of a periodic program of colorectal cancer screening in the elderly.
DESIGN: A model was constructed of four strategies for the periodic screening of persons 65 to 85 years of age. The effect of each strategy on life expectancy and health care costs was estimated under assumptions that were uniformly unfavorable to screening. Cost and added years of life were discounted at 5% per year. Cost per year of life gained from screening was calculated for each screening strategy. DATA SOURCES: Assumptions used in the model were based on a review of pertinent studies; those studies with results more unfavorable to screening were given more weight. Strengths and weaknesses of studies are discussed. MAIN
RESULTS: A program of annual fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in the elderly would detect at least 17% of the expected cases of cancer and could cost $35,000 per year of life saved. Screening schedules that include periodic sigmoidoscopy would prevent more cases of cancer but could cost between $43,000 and $47,000 per year of life gained. These estimates are based on uncertain assumptions, but results were not extremely sensitive to further relaxation of the values of the most uncertain assumptions. In no case did the cost per year of life gained from annual FOBT exceed $55,000 or did the cost per year of life gained from FOBT with sigmoidoscopy every 5 years exceed $61,000.
CONCLUSIONS: Although colorectal cancer screening is costly in the aggregate, its potential medical benefits make it a reasonably cost-effective preventive intervention for the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1929029     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-10-807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  17 in total

Review 1.  The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Joel F Wallace; Scott R Weingarten; Chiun-Fang Chiou; James M Henning; Andriana A Hohlbauch; Margaret S Richards; Nicole S Herzog; Lior S Lewensztain; Joshua J Ofman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Latosinsky
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Feasible economic strategies to improve screening compliance for colorectal cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Sang Min Park; Young Ho Yun; Soonman Kwon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Modeling therapeutic benefit in the midst of uncertainty: therapy for hepatitis C.

Authors:  W G Bennett; S G Pauker; G L Davis; J B Wong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  A systematic comparison of microsimulation models of colorectal cancer: the role of assumptions about adenoma progression.

Authors:  Karen M Kuntz; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; James E Savarino; Eric J Feuer; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Addition of adult-to-adult living donation to liver transplant programs improves survival but at an increased cost.

Authors:  Patrick G Northup; Michael M Abecassis; Michael J Englesbe; Jean C Emond; Vanessa D Lee; George J Stukenborg; Lan Tong; Carl L Berg
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Gender and race/ethnicity affect the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Charles P Theuer; Thomas H Taylor; Wendy R Brewster; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Socioeconomic and racial patterns of colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees in 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; George Reed; Terry S Field; Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  What is the most cost-effective strategy to screen for second primary colorectal cancers in male cancer survivors in Korea?

Authors:  Sang-Min Park; Sun-Young Kim; Craig-C Earle; Seung-Yong Jeong; Young-Ho Yun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.