Literature DB >> 21030874

Effect of a patient navigator program on the volume and quality of colonoscopy.

Benjamin Lebwohl1, Alfred I Neugut, Eliezer Stavsky, Sonia Villegas, Corinne Meli, Orlando Rodriguez, Carmen Franco, Marian S Krauskopf, Richard Rosenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: To increase colorectal cancer screening among urban minorities, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University, with support from the New York City Department of Health and the Citywide Colon Cancer Control Coalition (C5), instituted a patient navigation and direct endoscopic referral system. We assessed the effect of this program on the volume of colonoscopy in this institution, which caters to a socioeconomically diverse patient population. STUDY: We compared colonoscopy volume during the first year of the navigator program with the volume during the year before this program. We stratified on Medicaid status to assess the secular trend of screening rates. To assess quality during this period, we measured cecal intubation rates, preparation quality, and adenoma detection rates.
RESULTS: Of the 749 patients assessed by the patient navigators, 678 (91%) underwent colonoscopy. Colonoscopy volume among the Medicaid outpatients increased by 56% (957 to 1489). Adenoma detection was 27% and the cecal intubation rate was 97%. Comparing navigated patients with the nonnavigated Medicaid outpatients, preparation quality was superior (34% vs. 40% suboptimal, P=0.0282), although preparation quality remained inferior to that of private patients (20% suboptimal, P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Volume of the colonoscopy increased, coinciding with the onset of the patient navigation program. This increase was nearly entirely owing to a rise in the colonoscopies among Medicaid outpatients, the principal focus of the navigator program. This increase in quantity was accomplished while maintaining an overall high level of quality as measured by cecal intubation rates and adenoma detection, although preparation quality requires further efforts at improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21030874      PMCID: PMC3032043          DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181f595c3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  17 in total

1.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; T R Church; J H Bond; F Ederer; M S Geisser; S J Mongin; D C Snover; L M Schuman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Differences in colorectal carcinoma stage and survival by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  Chloe Chien; Libby M Morimoto; Jamie Tom; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Evaluation of an intervention to increase screening colonoscopy in an urban public hospital setting.

Authors:  Denis Nash; Sulaiman Azeez; David Vlahov; Melissa Schori
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Patient navigation: a community centered approach to reducing cancer mortality.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Use of a patient navigator to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban neighborhood health clinic.

Authors:  Lina Jandorf; Yahaira Gutierrez; Jaime Lopez; Jennifer Christie; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  Use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  A program to enhance completion of screening colonoscopy among urban minorities.

Authors:  Lea Ann Chen; Stephanie Santos; Lina Jandorf; Jennifer Christie; Anabella Castillo; Gary Winkel; Steven Itzkowitz
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race.

Authors:  Jessica D Albano; Elizabeth Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; Robert Anderson; Vilma E Cokkinides; Taylor Murray; Jane Henley; Jonathan Liff; Michael J Thun
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Timothy C Wang; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  New York Citywide Colon Cancer Control Coalition: A public health effort to increase colon cancer screening and address health disparities.

Authors:  Steven H Itzkowitz; Sidney J Winawer; Marian Krauskopf; Mari Carlesimo; Felice H Schnoll-Sussman; Katy Huang; Thomas K Weber; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Plasma Oncostatin M, TNF-α, IL-7, and IL-13 Network Predicts Crohn's Disease Response to Infliximab, as Assessed by Calprotectin Log Drop.

Authors:  Beatriz Mateos; Esteban Sáez-González; Inés Moret; David Hervás; Marisa Iborra; Elena Cerrillo; Luis Tortosa; Pilar Nos; Belén Beltrán
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.404

3.  Colorectal cancer: Increasing colorectal cancer screening--miles to go.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Paul C Schroy
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Barriers and facilitators to adherence to screening colonoscopy among African-Americans: a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Carrie R Wong; Elana R Bloomfield; Danielle M Crookes; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Screening colonoscopy bowel preparation: experience in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Patricia Zybert; Benjamin Lebwohl; Celia Shmukler; Alfred I Neugut; Steven Shea
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.409

6.  Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention.

Authors:  Jamilia R Sly; Tiffany Edwards; Rachel C Shelton; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2012-10-19

7.  Colorectal neoplasia detection among black and Latino individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristen K Lee; Lina Jandorf; Linda Thélèmaque; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Economic assessment of patient navigation to colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening in the real-world setting at the University of Chicago Medical Center.

Authors:  Karen E Kim; Fornessa Randal; Matt Johnson; Michael Quinn; Chieko Maene; Sonja Hoover; Valerie Richmond-Reese; Florence K L Tangka; Djenaba A Joseph; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Training in Patient Navigation: A Review of the Research Literature.

Authors:  Amy E Ustjanauskas; Marissa Bredice; Sumayah Nuhaily; Lisa Kath; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2015-12-08

10.  Correlates of colorectal cancer screening among residents of Ohio Appalachia.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Adana A Llanos; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Chul-joo Lee; Mira L Katz
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.