Literature DB >> 19620398

Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a nonequilibrium population.

Kai Zeng1, Brian Charlesworth.   

Abstract

Codon usage bias is the nonrandom use of synonymous codons for the same amino acid. Most population genetic models of codon usage evolution assume that the population is at mutation-selection-drift equilibrium. Natural populations, however, frequently deviate from equilibrium, often because of recent demographic changes. Here, we construct a matrix model that includes the effects of a recent change in population size on estimates of selection on preferred vs. unpreferred codons. Our results suggest that patterns of synonymous polymorphisms affecting codon usage can be quite erratic after such a change; statistical methods that fail to take demographic effects into account can then give incorrect estimates of important parameters. We propose a new method that can accurately estimate both demographic and codon usage parameters. The method also provides a simple way of testing for the effects of covariates such as gene length and level of gene expression on the intensity of selection, which we apply to a large Drosophila melanogaster polymorphism data set. Our analyses of twofold degenerate codons reveal that (i) selection acts in favor of preferred codons, (ii) there is mutational bias in favor of unpreferred codons, (iii) shorter genes and genes with higher expression levels are under stronger selection, and (iv) there is little evidence for a recent change in population size in the Zimbabwe population of D. melanogaster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19620398      PMCID: PMC2766324          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.101782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  62 in total

1.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  G A McVean; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicolas Galtier; Eric Bazin; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Hong Qin; Wei Biao Wu; Josep M Comeron; Martin Kreitman; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Approximate Bayesian inference reveals evidence for a recent, severe bottleneck in a Netherlands population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kevin Thornton; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Local recombination and mutation effects on molecular evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  T Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A test of translational selection at 'silent' sites in the human genome: base composition comparisons in alternatively spliced genes.

Authors:  K Iida; H Akashi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-12-30       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Selection intensity on preferred codons correlates with overall codon usage bias in Caenorhabditis remanei.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  G A McVean; J Vieira
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Local changes in GC/AT substitution biases and in crossover frequencies on Drosophila chromosomes.

Authors:  T Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Variation in synonymous codon use and DNA polymorphism within the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  N Bierne; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.411

View more
  33 in total

1.  Genetic linkage and natural selection.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias.

Authors:  Paul M Sharp; Laura R Emery; Kai Zeng
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The effects of demography and linkage on the estimation of selection and mutation parameters.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Stabilizing selection, purifying selection, and mutational bias in finite populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Selection on codon usage and base composition in Drosophila americana.

Authors:  Sophie Marion de Procé; Kai Zeng; Andrea J Betancourt; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Charlesworth et al. on Background Selection and Neutral Diversity.

Authors:  Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Inferences of demography and selection in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Jeffrey D Jensen; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.