Literature DB >> 10545459

Local recombination and mutation effects on molecular evolution in Drosophila.

T Takano-Shimizu1.   

Abstract

I studied the cause of the significant difference in the synonymous-substitution pattern found in the achaete-scute complex genes in two Drosophila lineages, higher codon bias in Drosophila yakuba, and lower bias in D. melanogaster. Besides these genes, the functionally unrelated yellow gene showed the same substitution pattern, suggesting a region-dependent phenomenon in the X-chromosome telomere. Because the numbers of A/T --> G/C substitutions were not significantly different from those of G/C --> A/T in the yellow noncoding regions of these species, a AT/GC mutational bias could not completely account for the synonymous-substitution biases. In contrast, we did find an approximately 14-fold difference in recombination rates in the X-chromosome telomere regions between the two species, suggesting that the reduction of recombination rates in this region resulted in the reduction of the efficacy of selection in D. melanogaster. In addition, the D. orena yellow showed a 5% increase in the G + C content at silent sites in the coding and noncoding regions since the divergence from D. erecta. This pattern was significantly different from those at the orena Adh and Amy loci. These results suggest that local changes in recombination rates and mutational pressures are contributing to the irregular synonymous-substitution patterns in Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10545459      PMCID: PMC1460815     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  64 in total

1.  Restriction fragment length polymorphism and divergence in the genomic regions of high and low recombination in self-fertilizing and cross-fertilizing aegilops species.

Authors:  J Dvorák; M C Luo; Z L Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Intraspecific and interspecific variation at the y-ac-sc region of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J M Martín-Campos; J M Comerón; N Miyashita; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Synonymous substitution rates in enterobacteria.

Authors:  A Eyre-Walker; M Bulmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Fitness of RNA virus decreased by Muller's ratchet.

Authors:  L Chao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila.

Authors:  M Solignac; M Monnerot; J C Mounolou
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Separate regulatory elements are responsible for the complex pattern of tissue-specific and developmental transcription of the yellow locus in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P K Geyer; V G Corces
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of molecular evolution.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genetic screens for factors involved in the notum bristle loss of interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  T Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Xulio Maside; Soojin Yi; Anna L Grant; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A cis-regulatory sequence within the yellow locus of Drosophila melanogaster required for normal male mating success.

Authors:  Mark David Drapeau; Shawn A Cyran; Michaela M Viering; Pamela K Geyer; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Fine-scale crossover rate heterogeneity in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Cirulli; Richard M Kliman; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Daniel Lachaise; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The other side of the nearly neutral theory, evidence of slightly advantageous back-mutations.

Authors:  Jane Charlesworth; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evolution of gene sequence in response to chromosomal location.

Authors:  Carlos Díaz-Castillo; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall; Peter Andolfatto; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Molecular population genetics and evolution of Drosophila meiosis genes.

Authors:  Jennifer A Anderson; William D Gilliland; Charles H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.