Literature DB >> 12621435

Optimal transsaccadic integration explains distorted spatial perception.

Matthias Niemeier1, J Douglas Crawford, Douglas B Tweed.   

Abstract

We scan our surroundings with quick eye movements called saccades, and from the resulting sequence of images we build a unified percept by a process known as transsaccadic integration. This integration is often said to be flawed, because around the time of saccades, our perception is distorted and we show saccadic suppression of displacement (SSD): we fail to notice if objects change location during the eye movement. Here we show that transsaccadic integration works by optimal inference. We simulated a visuomotor system with realistic saccades, retinal acuity, motion detectors and eye-position sense, and programmed it to make optimal use of these imperfect data when interpreting scenes. This optimized model showed human-like SSD and distortions of spatial perception. It made new predictions, including tight correlations between perception and motor action (for example, more SSD in people with less-precise eye control) and a graded contraction of perceived jumps; we verified these predictions experimentally. Our results suggest that the brain constructs its evolving picture of the world by optimally integrating each new piece of sensory or motor information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12621435     DOI: 10.1038/nature01439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  55 in total

1.  Remapping of the line motion illusion across eye movements.

Authors:  David Melcher; Alessio Fracasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Anticipating the three-dimensional consequences of eye movements.

Authors:  Mark Wexler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transsaccadic integration of visual features in a line intersection task.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Matthias Niemeier; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback.

Authors:  Siavash Vaziri; Jörn Diedrichsen; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Mislocalization of perceived saccade target position induced by perisaccadic visual stimulation.

Authors:  Holger Awater; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Fusion of visual and auditory stimuli during saccades: a Bayesian explanation for perisaccadic distortions.

Authors:  Paola Binda; Aurelio Bruno; David C Burr; Maria C Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Optimal multimodal integration in spatial localization.

Authors:  Martina Poletti; David C Burr; Michele Rucci
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Authors:  Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The effect of saccade metrics on the corollary discharge contribution to perceived eye location.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Matthew S Peterson; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Human thalamus contributes to perceptual stability across eye movements.

Authors:  Florian Ostendorf; Daniela Liebermann; Christoph J Ploner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.