Literature DB >> 19109455

Near optimal combination of sensory and motor uncertainty in time during a naturalistic perception-action task.

A Aldo Faisal1, Daniel M Wolpert.   

Abstract

Most behavioral tasks have time constraints for successful completion, such as catching a ball in flight. Many of these tasks require trading off the time allocated to perception and action, especially when only one of the two is possible at any time. In general, the longer we perceive, the smaller the uncertainty in perceptual estimates. However, a longer perception phase leaves less time for action, which results in less precise movements. Here we examine subjects catching a virtual ball. Critically, as soon as subjects began to move, the ball became invisible. We study how subjects trade-off sensory and movement uncertainty by deciding when to initiate their actions. We formulate this task in a probabilistic framework and show that subjects' decisions when to start moving are statistically near optimal given their individual sensory and motor uncertainties. Moreover, we accurately predict individual subject's task performance. Thus we show that subjects in a natural task are quantitatively aware of how sensory and motor variability depend on time and act so as to minimize overall task variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19109455      PMCID: PMC2695629          DOI: 10.1152/jn.90974.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  31 in total

1.  Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth.

Authors:  R A Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Perception of acceleration with short presentation times: can acceleration be used in interception?

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The role of execution noise in movement variability.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Patrick Haggard; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Gianfranco Bosco; Vincenzo Maffei; Marco Iosa; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mixture models and the probabilistic structure of depth cues.

Authors:  David C Knill
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Bayesian integration in force estimation.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Shih-pi Ku; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  Rebecca M C Spencer; Howard N Zelaznik; Jörn Diedrichsen; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Noise in the nervous system.

Authors:  A Aldo Faisal; Luc P J Selen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Motor control is decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Balancing out dwelling and moving: optimal sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Ignasi Cos; Benoît Girard; Emmanuel Guigon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  How the required precision influences the way we intercept a moving object.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland; Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Acquisition, representation, and transfer of models of visuo-motor error.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Mila Kirstie C Kulsa; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The visual encoding of purely proprioceptive intermanual tasks is due to the need of transforming joint signals, not to their interhemispheric transfer.

Authors:  Léo Arnoux; Sebastien Fromentin; Dario Farotto; Mathieu Beraneck; Joseph McIntyre; Michele Tagliabue
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Temporal resolution of single-photon responses in primate rod photoreceptors and limits imposed by cellular noise.

Authors:  Greg D Field; Valerie Uzzell; E J Chichilnisky; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Does risk-sensitivity transfer across movements?

Authors:  Megan K O'Brien; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Raz Leib; Assaf Pressman; Lucia S Simo; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.