Literature DB >> 19590852

The role of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the older patients, 55 years or above.

James Edmund Arbuthnot1, Rodney B Brink.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency can result in symptomatic functional instability of the knee regardless of the patient's age. We reviewed a single surgeon database of 908 ACL reconstructions carried out in the last 20 years for symptomatic instability. 14 patients were identified who were 55 years or above at surgery (mean: 60 years, range 55-75 years). Patients were evaluated clinically and with clinical outcome scoring and KT-1000 arthrometry assessment. 12 patients (86%) were available to attend for follow-up at a mean 9 years after ACL reconstruction. The median pre-injury Tegner score was 5.5 (range 1-7) and the median pre-operative Lysholm score was 33 (range 15-67). Initially, one patient had a good result but subsequently the patient undergone total knee replacement 5 years after ACL reconstruction. For the remainder, at the most recent review, the median Lysholm score had improved to 79 (range 43-100, P < 0.05) although it had deteriorated from the maximum achieved post-op score of 85.5 (range 53-100, P < 0.05); and the Tegner score had declined to 3 (range 1-5, P < 0.05). KT-1000 testing demonstrated a mean side-to-side difference improvement in laxity from 4.6 +/- 1.3 mm (range 3-7) to 1.5 +/- 1.2 mm (range 0-4, P < 0.05) and >2 mm difference in only one knee (for which it was known that the graft had failed at 11 years after ACL reconstruction). At review, the same knee was the only one that demonstrated a pivot shift. ACL reconstruction with autograft in the above-55 patient with minimal osteoarthritis is a safe procedure that returns stability to the knee and permits a return to a reasonable level of activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590852     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0864-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  46 in total

1.  A comparison of results in middle-aged and young patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Brandsson; J Kartus; J Larsson; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Total knee arthroplasty after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Samuel C Hoxie; Ryan E Dobbs; Diane L Dahm; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients over 50 years.

Authors:  D L Dahm; C A Wulf; K A Dajani; R E Dobbs; B A Levy; M A Stuart
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-11

4.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The evaluation of intraarticular lesions accompanying ACL ruptures in military personnel who elected not to restrict their daily activities: the effect of age and time from injury.

Authors:  Halil Yalçin Yüksel; Serkan Erkan; Macit Uzun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients over 40 years of age].

Authors:  Frank Damborg; Nis Nissen; Ejnar Kuur
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2002-02-25

7.  Intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the symptomatic arthritic knee.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; J H Wilckens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Analysis of meniscal and chondral lesions accompanying anterior cruciate ligament tears: relationship with age, time from injury, and level of sport.

Authors:  Reha N Tandogan; Omer Taşer; Asim Kayaalp; Emin Taşkiran; Halit Pinar; Bülent Alparslan; Aziz Alturfan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Prevalence of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis 15 years after nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Neuman; Martin Englund; Ioannis Kostogiannis; Thomas Fridén; Harald Roos; Leif E Dahlberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years or older: an expected-value decision analysis.

Authors:  Khemarin Seng; David Appleby; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  9 in total

1.  Age as a predictor of residual muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Kenji Shirakura; Takashi Horaguchi; Naoki Wada; Makoto Sohmiya; Masayuki Tazawa; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Alberto Grassi; Simone Perelli; Giuseppe Agrò; Federico Bozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Surgery for ACL deficiency in patients over 50.

Authors:  Leonardo Osti; Rocco Papalia; Angelo Del Buono; Francesco Leonardi; Vincenzo Denaro; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Acute ACL reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age.

Authors:  Guido Wierer; Armin Runer; Christian Hoser; Elmar Herbst; Peter Gföller; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Outcomes after ACL reconstruction with focus on older patients: results from The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Kristian Samuelsson; Jón Karlsson; Magnus Forssblad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Johannes Struewer; Ewgeni Ziring; Ludwig Oberkircher; Karl F Schüttler; Turgay Efe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft in Patients Aged 50 and Older Leads to Improved Activity Levels and Acceptable Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen M Sylvia; Thomas J Gill; Ian D Engler; Kaitlin M Carroll; Matthew J Salzler
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-14

Review 8.  Results After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 40 Years: How Do They Compare With Younger Patients? A Systematic Review and Comparison With Younger Populations.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Rachel M Frank; Bryan M Saltzman; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Patellar tendon or hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in patients aged above 50 years.

Authors:  Tarun Bali; Raghu Nagraj; Malhar N Kumar; Thomas Chandy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.