Literature DB >> 10705330

A comparison of results in middle-aged and young patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

S Brandsson1, J Kartus, J Larsson, B I Eriksson, J Karlsson.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the results after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in middle-aged and young patients. From our database (including 604 patients with a follow-up rate of 95%), we extracted all the patients over 40 years of age (group A, n = 30) and compared them with a group of patients from the same material, aged between 20 and 24 years (group B, n = 37). The groups were comparable in terms of the male:female ratio and surgical techniques. The follow-up was performed by independent observers. The median follow-up period was 31 months (range, 22 to 60 months) in group A and 38 months (24 to 60 months) in group B (P =.014). Before injury, the Tegner activity level was 6 (4-9) in group A and 9 (4-9) in group B (P <.001). At follow-up, the Tegner activity level was 5 (3-9) in group A and 6 (3-9) in group B (P =.032). At the follow-up, there was no difference in terms of the Lysholm score, which was 91 (37-100) and 89 (38-100) points in group A and group B, respectively. Using the IKDC evaluation system, 10 patients (33%) were classified as normal, 12 (40%) as nearly normal, 6 (20%) as abnormal, and 2 (7%) as severely abnormal in group A, compared with 8 (22%) normal, 18 (48%) nearly normal, 10 (27%) abnormal, and 1 (3%) severely abnormal in group B (NS). The 1-leg hop quotient was 90% (52-167) in group A and 93% (70-118) in group B (P =.056). The KT-1000 measurement showed an anterior side-to-side laxity difference of 2.0 mm (-4 to 8.5 mm) in group A and 2.0 mm (-2.5 to 8.0 mm) in group B (not significant). The middle-aged patients were subjectively more pleased with the results than the younger patients. There were no differences in either early or late complications between the groups. At the index operation, 11 of 30 patients (37%) in group A and 1 of 37 (3%) in group B had cartilage lesions or degenerative changes (P <.001). Age does not appear to disqualify middle-aged patients with symptomatic ACL tears from undergoing reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10705330     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(00)90033-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  26 in total

1.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over the age of 50 years: 2- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mark J G Blyth; Harminder S Gosal; Wendy M Peake; R John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years using hamstring autograft.

Authors:  R M Khan; V Prasad; R Gangone; J C Kinmont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than fifty years: a comparison with a younger age group.

Authors:  Raffaele Iorio; Ferdinando Iannotti; Antonio Ponzo; Lorenzo Proietti; Andrea Redler; Fabio Conteduca; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Surgery for ACL deficiency in patients over 50.

Authors:  Leonardo Osti; Rocco Papalia; Angelo Del Buono; Francesco Leonardi; Vincenzo Denaro; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Acute ACL reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age.

Authors:  Guido Wierer; Armin Runer; Christian Hoser; Elmar Herbst; Peter Gföller; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Soo Yeon Park; Hoon Oh; Sua Park; Jung Hwan Lee; Sang Hak Lee; Kyoung Ho Yoon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Outcomes after ACL reconstruction with focus on older patients: results from The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Kristian Samuelsson; Jón Karlsson; Magnus Forssblad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Johannes Struewer; Ewgeni Ziring; Ludwig Oberkircher; Karl F Schüttler; Turgay Efe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pia Thomeé; Peter Währborg; Mats Börjesson; Roland Thomeé; B I Eriksson; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Evidence based medicine in clinical practice: how to advise patients on the influence of age on the outcome of surgical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of the literature.

Authors:  P A Sloane; H Brazier; A W Murphy; T Collins
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.