Literature DB >> 23377111

Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Johannes Struewer1, Ewgeni Ziring, Ludwig Oberkircher, Karl F Schüttler, Turgay Efe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency contributes to symptomatic functional instability of the knee, regardless of age. We evaluated patient-reported clinical outcome, instrumental stability and prevalence of radiological osteoarthritis based on two homogenous patient samples aged 50 years, an average of three years after isolated ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft was done in 19 patients and a four-stranded semitendinosus tendon (ST) autograft in 22 patients. Clinical and functional follow-up assessment was performed an average of 32 months after surgical treatment. Clinical and functional follow-up assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner score and Lysholm score. Instrumental stability testing was carried out using the KT-1000™ arthrometer. The degree of degenerative changes and prevalence of osteoarthritis was based on the Kellgren-Lawrence classification.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 32 months (range, 28-36). Mean age was 49.4 years in both groups. The median pre-injury Tegner score was 5.5 (range, 2-8) and the median preoperative Lysholm score was 35 (range, 15-69). At two years, all variables improved significantly for both groups compared to the preoperative values (P < 0.05), with no significant intergroup differences. Approximately 76 % of patients were graded A or B according to the IKDC score in both groups. Activity level according to the scores of Tegner and Lysholm was 4.9/5.3 and 83.4/82.5 on two-year-follow up in both groups. Radiological assessment reported degenerative changes of grade I Osteoarthritis (OA) in 36 % of patients. Grade-II OA was found in 31 % of patients. Grade-III OA and grade-IV OA were found in about 24 % and 7 % of all patients, respectively. Correlation analyses showed significant relationships between conservation of knee-joint stability and clinical outcome according to the IKDC score, and activity level according to the Lysholm score (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using either BPTB graft or hamstring graft in appropriately selected middle-aged patients results in patient satisfaction and good clinical results, with return to a reasonable level of activity regardless of surgical method and graft choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23377111      PMCID: PMC3631493          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1807-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  41 in total

1.  A comparison of results in middle-aged and young patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Brandsson; J Kartus; J Larsson; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over the age of 50 years: 2- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mark J G Blyth; Harminder S Gosal; Wendy M Peake; R John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Non-operative treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. Results after long-term follow-up.

Authors:  M G Ciccotti; S J Lombardo; B Nonweiler; M Pink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.

Authors:  J Lysholm; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Non-operative treatment of severe injuries to the medial and anterior cruciate ligaments of the knee.

Authors:  P Jokl; N Kaplan; P Stovell; K Keggi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Knee function and prevalence of osteoarthritis after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Johannes Struewer; Thomas Manfred Frangen; Bernd Ishaque; Christopher Bliemel; Turgay Efe; Steffen Ruchholtz; Ewgeni Ziring
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the symptomatic arthritic knee.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; J H Wilckens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Arthroscopic observations of autogeneic quadriceps and patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee.

Authors:  K Yasuda; Y Tomiyama; Y Ohkoshi; K Kaneda
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Fate of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee.

Authors:  Donald C Fithian; Liz W Paxton; David H Goltz
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  15 in total

1.  Knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than forty years: comparison between different age groups.

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Conteduca Fabio; Ludovico Caperna; Caperna Ludovico; Andrea Ferretti; Ferretti Andrea; Raffaele Iorio; Iorio Raffaele; Carolina Civitenga; Civitenga Carolina; Antonio Ponzo; Ponzo Antonio
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Biomechanical Comparison Between Bashti Bone Plug Technique and Biodegradable Screw for Fixation of Grafts in Ligament surgery.

Authors:  Kaveh Bashti; Mohammad N Tahmasebi; Hasan Kaseb; Farzam Farahmand; Mohammad Akbar; Amir Mobini
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-01-15

3.  Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Alberto Grassi; Simone Perelli; Giuseppe Agrò; Federico Bozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Jakub Kautzner; Petr Kos; Martin Hanus; Tomas Trc; Vojtech Havlas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than fifty years: a comparison with a younger age group.

Authors:  Raffaele Iorio; Ferdinando Iannotti; Antonio Ponzo; Lorenzo Proietti; Andrea Redler; Fabio Conteduca; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Acute ACL reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age.

Authors:  Guido Wierer; Armin Runer; Christian Hoser; Elmar Herbst; Peter Gföller; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament injury: post-traumatic bone marrow oedema correlates with long-term prognosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Francesco Tentoni; Luca Andriolo; Alessandro Di Martino; Maurizio Busacca; Berardo Di Matteo; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Age over 50 does not predict results in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Katia Corona; Simone Cerciello; Michele Vasso; Giuseppe Toro; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Enrico Pola; Gianluca Ciolli; Michele Mercurio; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-07-27

Review 9.  Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ha Sung Kim; Jong Keun Seon; Ah Reum Jo
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-29

10.  Position of anterior cruciate ligament after single-bundle arthroscopic reconstruction.

Authors:  Bogdan Ioan Andrei; Marius Niculescu; Gheorghe Popescu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.