Literature DB >> 27778041

Acute ACL reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age.

Guido Wierer1, Armin Runer2, Christian Hoser2, Elmar Herbst3, Peter Gföller4, Christian Fink2,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcome of ACL reconstructions in patients older than 40 years of age to younger subjects. It has been hypothesized that patients older than 40 years of age achieve comparable clinical outcomes following acute ACL reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft than younger patients.
METHODS: Patients with an isolated ACL tear without any concomitant injuries and subsequent ACL reconstruction within 48 h from injury were included in this prospective study. According to patients' age, subjects were assigned to two groups: (A) 18-40 years and (B) 40-60 years. Functional outcomes, pain, post-operative radiographs and return to sports were recorded and analysed. The follow-up period was 24 months.
RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included in the study. Group A consisted of 39 patients (14 women, 25 men; median 27 years), group B of 20 patients (12 women, 8 men; median 45 years) respectively. At final follow-up, the Lysholm score showed no significant difference between group A (median 90; range 68-100) and group B (median 94.5; range 63-100) (n.s.). The final Tegner score showed a significant difference between group A (median 6; range 2-9) and group B (median 5.5; range 3-8) (p < 0.05). The mean VAS pain score was 1.3 (range 0-6) in group A and 1 (range 0-7) in group B, respectively (n.s.). Both groups returned to their pre-injury activity level and did not significantly change their activity in respect of pivoting sports and sports frequency at final follow-up (n.s.). According to the IKDC score, all except one of the patients in group A and all patients in group B had a normal or nearly normal final outcome (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: Patients older than 40 years of age achieve comparable clinical outcomes following acute ACL reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft than younger patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cohort study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; Acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Hamstring graft; Middle age; Over 40 years

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27778041     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4363-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  49 in total

1.  Subacute versus delayed reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the competitive athlete.

Authors:  J Karlsson; J Kartus; L Magnusson; J Larsson; S Brandsson; B I Eriksson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A comparison of results in middle-aged and young patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Brandsson; J Kartus; J Larsson; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Long-term outcome of operative or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture--is sports activity a determining variable?

Authors:  C Fink; C Hoser; W Hackl; R A Navarro; K P Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than forty years: comparison between different age groups.

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Conteduca Fabio; Ludovico Caperna; Caperna Ludovico; Andrea Ferretti; Ferretti Andrea; Raffaele Iorio; Iorio Raffaele; Carolina Civitenga; Civitenga Carolina; Antonio Ponzo; Ponzo Antonio
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients over 50 years.

Authors:  D L Dahm; C A Wulf; K A Dajani; R E Dobbs; B A Levy; M A Stuart
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-11

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40 years: allograft versus autograft patellar tendon.

Authors:  Gene Barrett; David Stokes; Miranda White
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Non-operative treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. Results after long-term follow-up.

Authors:  M G Ciccotti; S J Lombardo; B Nonweiler; M Pink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Outcomes after ACL reconstruction with focus on older patients: results from The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Kristian Samuelsson; Jón Karlsson; Magnus Forssblad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Correlation of meniscal and articular cartilage injuries in children and adolescents with timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Allen F Anderson; Christian N Anderson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years or older: an expected-value decision analysis.

Authors:  Khemarin Seng; David Appleby; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  6 in total

1.  The morphology of the tibial footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament changes with ageing from oval/elliptical to C-shaped.

Authors:  Rodolfo Morales-Avalos; Tadeo A Castillo-Escobedo; Rodrigo E Elizondo-Omaña; María Del Carmen Theriot-Giron; Simone Perelli; Santos Guzmán-López; Víctor M Peña-Martínez; Félix Vílchez-Cavazos; Juan Carlos Monllau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Failure rate and patients-reported outcomes at 4-11 years of follow up.

Authors:  Piero Volpi; Alessandro Quaglia; Giulia Carimati; Marco Galli; Rocco Papalia; Stefano Petrillo
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-02-28

3.  Mid-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction across age groups: A national database study.

Authors:  McKayla Kelly; Justin Turcotte; Dimitri Thomas; Benjamin Petre; Christina Morganti; James York; Daniel Redziniak
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 4.  A Comparison of Results after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in over 40 and under 40 Years of Age: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kun-Tae Kim; Hyun-Jung Kim; Hyang-Im Lee; Young-Jin Park; Dong-Geun Kang; Jun-Ill Yoo; Dong-Kyu Moon; Sung-Hee Cho; Sun-Chul Hwang
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-06-01

5.  Patients Aged 50 Years and Older Have Greater Complication Rates After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Large Database Study.

Authors:  Madeleine A Salesky; Jake F Oeding; Alan L Zhang; C Benjamin Ma; Brian T Feeley; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-10-09

6.  Femoral attachment of anterior cruciate ligament remnant tissue influences the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee in patients over 40 years old.

Authors:  Tsuneari Takahashi; Takashi Ohsawa; Keiichi Hagiwara; Masashi Kimura; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2017-03-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.