Literature DB >> 19585122

Effective dose evaluation of multidetector CT examinations: influence of the ICRP recommendation in 2007.

Kosuke Matsubara1, Kichiro Koshida, Masayuki Suzuki, Tetsunori Shimono, Tomoyuki Yamamoto, Osamu Matsui.   

Abstract

We compared effective doses for recent computed tomography (CT) examinations calculated based on International Commission on Radiological Protection publication number 103 (ICRP 103) with those calculated based on ICRP publication number 60 (ICRP 60), and considered the usefulness of the effective dose in CT dose evaluation. After placing radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeters (RPLDs) inside or outside an anthropomorphic phantom, we examined from the chest to the pelvis, cardiac, and cranial regions of the phantom. The absorbed dose was calculated by multiplying calibrated dose values of RPLD by the mass energy coefficient ratio. The effective dose was calculated as the sum total of the value for each tissue, which was multiplied by the equivalent dose according to the tissue weighting factor recommended in ICRP 103 and ICRP 60. Calculated effective doses based on ICRP 103 were different by –11% to +82% compared with those based on ICRP 60. The values of absorbed doses for selective tissues were relatively higher than the values for the effective dose. The effective dose represents only a mean dose value for an average human. Therefore, assessing the absolute dose of particular individuals in CT examinations based exclusively on the effective dose is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19585122     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1497-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  14 in total

1.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot.

Authors:  T G Flohr; K Stierstorfer; S Ulzheimer; H Bruder; A N Primak; C H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.

Authors:  J B Ludlow; L E Davies-Ludlow; S L Brooks; W B Howerton
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

5.  In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?

Authors:  Florian Wolf; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Peter Homolka; Herbert Langenberger; Alfred Stadler; Till R Bader; Michael Weber; Johannes Lammer; Christian Loewe
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Tobias Krauss; Lotus Desbiolles; André Plass; Michele Genoni; Thomas G Flohr; Simon Wildermuth; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Optimizing radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Carlo Catalano; Marco Francone; Adriano Ascarelli; Matteo Mangia; Ilaria Iacucci; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Cranial CT with 64-, 16-, 4- and single-slice CT systems-comparison of image quality and posterior fossa artifacts in routine brain imaging with standard protocols.

Authors:  Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Lara Eftimov; Jeffrey Blume; Roland Bruening; Christoph Becker; Jean Cormack; Hartmut Brueckmann; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  O Rampado; F Marchisio; A Izzo; E Garelli; C C Bianchi; G Gandini; R Ropolo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Low dose CT of the heart: a quantum leap into a new era of cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  E Maffei; C Martini; S De Crescenzo; T Arcadi; A Clemente; E Capuano; A Rossi; R Malagò; N Mollet; A Weustink; C Tedeschi; L La Grutta; S Seitun; A Igoren Guaricci; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; John Heil; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of a chest circumference-adapted protocol for low-dose 128-slice coronary CT angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering.

Authors:  Chenying Lu; Zufei Wang; Jiansong Ji; Hailin Wang; Xianghua Hu; Chunmiao Chen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Performance of dual-source CT with high pitch spiral mode for coronary stent patency compared with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Xia Yang; Qiang Yu; Wei Dong; Zhen-Hong Fu; Jun-Jue Yang; Jun Guo; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Radiation dose and physical image quality in 128-section dual-source computed tomographic coronary angiography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Kosuke Matsubara; Haruka Koshida; Keita Sakuta; Tadanori Takata; Junsei Horii; Hiroji Iida; Kichiro Koshida; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.