Literature DB >> 19577136

Influence of thermoplastic appliance thickness on the magnitude of force delivered to a maxillary central incisor during tipping.

Wolfram Hahn1, Henning Dathe, Julia Fialka-Fricke, Susanne Fricke-Zech, Antonia Zapf, Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg, Reza Sadat-Khonsari.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to quantify the forces delivered by thermoplastic appliances made of 2 materials with 2 thicknesses to a maxillary central incisor during tipping.
METHODS: Two materials were tested, each in 2 thicknesses: Erkodur (Erkodent Erich Kopp GmbH, Pfalzgrafenweiler, Germany) 1.0 and 0.8 mm, and Biolon (Dreve Dentamid GmbH, Unna, Germany), 1.0 and 0.75 mm. For each material, 5 appliances were produced. To measure the forces applied, an isolated measuring tooth, part of a standardized resin model, was deflected in 0.05 degrees steps from 0 degrees to 0.42 degrees in the vestibular and palatine directions, after placing the respective appliance on the model. For statistical analysis, the force components Fx/tipping and Fz/intrusion at a displacement of +/- 0.151 mm from the incisor edge were selected. Means and standard deviations were calculated. The Wilcoxon 2-sample test for group pairings was used.
RESULTS: The norms for the mean Fx forces ranged from 1.62 (SD, 0.41) to 5.35 N (SD, 0.63). The mean Fz forces were between 0.07 (SD, 0.13) and -2.47 N (SD, 0.34). The highest intrusive forces were measured during vestibular displacement of the measuring tooth. The forces delivered by the thick appliances were overall significantly higher (P <0.0001) than those of the thin materials. The forces delivered by the Biolon appliances were generally significantly higher (P <0.0001) than those for the Erkodur materials.
CONCLUSIONS: The forces applied were mostly too high when compared with those stated in the literature as ideal. In addition to thickness, the thermoforming process influences the magnitude of the force delivered by a thermoformed appliance.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19577136     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  23 in total

1.  Forces and moments delivered by PET-G aligners to an upper central incisor for labial and palatal translation.

Authors:  Fayez Elkholy; Thanapon Panchaphongsaphak; Fatih Kilic; Falko Schmidt; Bernd G Lapatki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Micro computed tomography evaluation of Invisalign aligner thickness homogeneity.

Authors:  Edoardo Mantovani; Simone Parrini; Emanuele Coda; Giovanni Cugliari; Nicola Scotti; Damiano Pasqualini; Andrea Deregibus; Tommaso Castroflorio
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Three-dimensional nonlinear prediction of tooth movement from the force system and root morphology.

Authors:  Roberto Savignano; Rodrigo F Viecilli; Udochukwu Oyoyo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of aligner fit on teeth.

Authors:  Edoardo Mantovani; Enrico Castroflorio; Gabriele Rossini; Francesco Garino; Giovanni Cugliari; Andrea Deregibus; Tommaso Castroflorio
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effect of in vitro aging by water immersion and thermocycling on the mechanical properties of PETG aligner material.

Authors:  Benjamin A Ihssen; Jan H Willmann; Amr Nimer; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  The influence of occlusal forces on force delivery properties of aligners during rotation of an upper central incisor.

Authors:  Wolfram Hahn; Benjamin Engelke; Klaus Jung; Henning Dathe; Franz-Joseph Kramer; Tina Rödig; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Rudolf M Gruber
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Force decay of polyethylene terephthalate glycol aligner materials during simulation of typical clinical loading/unloading scenarios.

Authors:  Fayez Elkholy; Silva Schmidt; Falko Schmidt; Masoud Amirkhani; Bernd G Lapatki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Initial forces and moments delivered by removable thermoplastic appliances during rotation of an upper central incisor.

Authors:  Wolfram Hahn; Benjamin Engelke; Klaus Jung; Henning Dathe; Julia Fialka-Fricke; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Reza Sadat-Khonsari
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Effects of mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials on the initial force of thermoplastic appliances.

Authors:  Naohisa Kohda; Masahiro Iijima; Takeshi Muguruma; William A Brantley; Karamdeep S Ahluwalia; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  The force effects of two types of polyethylene terephthalate glyc-olmodified clear aligners immersed in artificial saliva.

Authors:  Biao Xiang; Xingxing Wang; Gang Wu; Yichen Xu; Menghan Wang; Yanjing Yang; Qingyu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.