Literature DB >> 23035832

Effects of mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials on the initial force of thermoplastic appliances.

Naohisa Kohda1, Masahiro Iijima, Takeshi Muguruma, William A Brantley, Karamdeep S Ahluwalia, Itaru Mizoguchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the forces delivered by thermoplastic appliances made from three materials and investigate effects of mechanical properties, material thickness, and amount of activation on orthodontic forces.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three thermoplastic materials, Duran (Scheu Dental), Erkodur (Erkodent Erich Kopp GmbH), and Hardcast (Scheu Dental), with two different thicknesses were selected. Values of elastic modulus and hardness were obtained from nanoindentation measurements at 28°C. A custom-fabricated system with a force sensor was employed to obtain measurements of in vitro force delivered by the thermoplastic appliances for 0.5-mm and 1.0-mm activation for bodily tooth movement. Experimental results were subjected to several statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Hardcast had significantly lower elastic modulus and hardness than Duran and Erkodur, whose properties were not significantly different. Appliances fabricated from thicker material (0.75 mm or 0.8 mm) always produced significantly greater force than those fabricated from thinner material (0.4 mm or 0.5 mm). Appliances with 1.0-mm activation produced significantly lower force than those with 0.5-mm activation, except for 0.4-mm thick Hardcast appliances. A strong correlation was found between mechanical properties of the thermoplastic materials and force produced by the appliances.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic forces delivered by thermoplastic appliances depend on the material, thickness, and amount of activation. Mechanical properties of the polymers obtained by nanoindentation testing are predictive of force delivery by these appliances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23035832      PMCID: PMC8763061          DOI: 10.2319/052512-432.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  17 in total

1.  Optimum force magnitude for orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Yijin Ren; Jaap C Maltha; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.

Authors:  Garret Djeu; Clarence Shelton; Anthony Maganzini
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 3: premolar extraction patients.

Authors:  Danilee K Baldwin; Greg King; Douglas S Ramsay; Greg Huang; Anne-Marie Bollen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Influence of thermoplastic appliance thickness on the magnitude of force delivered to a maxillary central incisor during tipping.

Authors:  Wolfram Hahn; Henning Dathe; Julia Fialka-Fricke; Susanne Fricke-Zech; Antonia Zapf; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Reza Sadat-Khonsari
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Initial forces generated by three types of thermoplastic appliances on an upper central incisor during tipping.

Authors:  Wolfram Hahn; Julia Fialka-Fricke; Henning Dathe; Susanne Fricke-Zech; Antonia Zapf; Rudolf Gruber; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Reza Sadat-Khonsari
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Comparisons of nanoindentation, 3-point bending, and tension tests for orthodontic wires.

Authors:  Masahiro Iijima; Takeshi Muguruma; William A Brantley; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Social perceptions of adults wearing orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  H G Jeremiah; D Bister; J T Newton
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  In-vivo von Mises strains during Invisalign treatment.

Authors:  Alexander D Vardimon; Daniel Robbins; Tamar Brosh
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Initial forces and moments delivered by removable thermoplastic appliances during rotation of an upper central incisor.

Authors:  Wolfram Hahn; Benjamin Engelke; Klaus Jung; Henning Dathe; Julia Fialka-Fricke; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Reza Sadat-Khonsari
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Force and amount of resin composite paste used in direct and indirect bonding.

Authors:  Takeshi Muguruma; Yoshitaka Yasuda; Masahiro Iijima; Naohisa Kohda; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  24 in total

1.  Micro computed tomography evaluation of Invisalign aligner thickness homogeneity.

Authors:  Edoardo Mantovani; Simone Parrini; Emanuele Coda; Giovanni Cugliari; Nicola Scotti; Damiano Pasqualini; Andrea Deregibus; Tommaso Castroflorio
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of aligner fit on teeth.

Authors:  Edoardo Mantovani; Enrico Castroflorio; Gabriele Rossini; Francesco Garino; Giovanni Cugliari; Andrea Deregibus; Tommaso Castroflorio
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Force changes associated with different intrusion strategies for deep-bite correction by clear aligners.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Wei Hu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effect of in vitro aging by water immersion and thermocycling on the mechanical properties of PETG aligner material.

Authors:  Benjamin A Ihssen; Jan H Willmann; Amr Nimer; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Comparative mechanical testing for different orthodontic aligner materials over time - in vitro study.

Authors:  Clara-Marie Nowak; Ahmed Othman; Dragan-Alexander Ströbele; Constantin von See
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-06-01

6.  Computer-aided finite element model for biomechanical analysis of orthodontic aligners.

Authors:  Tarek M Elshazly; Christoph Bourauel; Mostafa Aldesoki; Ahmed Ghoneima; Moosa Abuzayda; Wael Talaat; Sameh Talaat; Ludger Keilig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  The force effects of two types of polyethylene terephthalate glyc-olmodified clear aligners immersed in artificial saliva.

Authors:  Biao Xiang; Xingxing Wang; Gang Wu; Yichen Xu; Menghan Wang; Yanjing Yang; Qingyu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of different aligner materials and attachments on orthodontic behavior.

Authors:  Chung-Te Ho; Yun-Ting Huang; Chien-Wei Chao; Tsui-Hsine Huang; Chia-Tze Kao
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.080

9.  Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of clear aligners after thermoforming and aging.

Authors:  Kazem Dalaie; Seyyed Mostafa Fatemi; Samin Ghaffari
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  SEM characterization and ageing analysis on two generation of invisible aligners.

Authors:  Roberta Condò; Gianluca Mampieri; Aldo Giancotti; Loredana Cerroni; Guido Pasquantonio; Andrea Divizia; Annalisa Convertino; Barbara Mecheri; Luca Maiolo
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.