Literature DB >> 22651883

Downstream testing and subsequent procedures after coronary computed tomographic angiography following coronary stenting in patients ≥65 years of age.

Daniel Mudrick1, Lisa A Kaltenbach, Bimal Shah, Barbara Lytle, Frederick A Masoudi, Daniel B Mark, Jerome J Federspiel, Patricia A Cowper, Cynthia Green, Pamela S Douglas.   

Abstract

Limited data are available on the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in patients who have received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To evaluate patterns of cardiac testing including CCTA after PCI, we created a retrospective observational dataset linking National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry baseline data with longitudinal inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims data for patients who received coronary stenting from November 1, 2005 through December 31, 2007. In 192,009 patients with PCI (median age 74 years), the first test after coronary stenting was CCTA for 553 (0.3%), stress testing for 89,900 (46.8%), and coronary angiography for 22,308 (11.6%); 79,248 (41.3%) had no further testing. Patients referred to CCTA first generally had similar or lower baseline risk than those referred for stress testing or catheterization first. Compared to patients with stress testing first after PCI, patients who underwent CCTA first had higher unadjusted rates of subsequent noninvasive testing (10% vs 3%), catheterization (26% vs 15%), and revascularization (13% vs 8%) within 90 days of initial testing after PCI (p <0.0001 for all comparisons). In conclusion, despite similar or lesser-risk profiles, patients initially evaluated with CCTA after PCI had more downstream testing and revascularization than patients initially evaluated with stress testing. It is unclear whether these differences derive from patient selection, performance of CCTA compared to other testing strategies, or the association of early adoption of CCTA with distinct patterns of care.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22651883      PMCID: PMC3915770          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR): building a national clinical data repository.

Authors:  R G Brindis; S Fitzgerald; H V Anderson; R E Shaw; W S Weintraub; J F Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Peripheral arterial disease: therapeutic confidence of CT versus digital subtraction angiography and effects on additional imaging recommendations.

Authors:  Miraude E A P M Adriaensen; Marc C J M Kock; Theo Stijnen; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Hero van Urk; Peter M T Pattynama; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Allen J Taylor; Manuel Cerqueira; John McB Hodgson; Daniel Mark; James Min; Patrick O'Gara; Geoffrey D Rubin; Christopher M Kramer; Daniel Berman; Alan Brown; Farooq A Chaudhry; Ricardo C Cury; Milind Y Desai; Andrew J Einstein; Antoinette S Gomes; Robert Harrington; Udo Hoffmann; Rahul Khare; John Lesser; Christopher McGann; Alan Rosenberg; Robert Schwartz; Marc Shelton; Gerald W Smetana; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Patterns of cardiac stress testing after revascularization in community practice.

Authors:  Bimal R Shah; Patricia A Cowper; Sean M O'Brien; Neil Jensen; Matthew Drawz; Manesh R Patel; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  James K Min; Amanda Gilmore; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel S Berman; Ken O'Day
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nazario Carrabba; Joanne D Schuijf; Fleur R de Graaf; Guido Parodi; Erica Maffei; Renato Valenti; Alessandro Palumbo; Annick C Weustink; Nico R Mollet; Gabriele Accetta; Filippo Cademartiri; David Antoniucci; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population.

Authors:  Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Thorarinn Gudnason; Axel F Sigurdsson; Jonina Gudjonsdottir; Sam J Lehman; Kristjan Eyjolfsson; Sigurpall S Scheving; C Michael Gibson; Udo Hoffmann; Birna Jonsdottir; Karl Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  James K Min; Ning Kang; Leslee J Shaw; Richard B Devereux; Matthew Robinson; Fay Lin; Antonio P Legorreta; Amanda Gilmore
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diagnostic-therapeutic cascade revisited: coronary angiography, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern era.

Authors:  F L Lucas; A E Siewers; D J Malenka; D E Wennberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers.

Authors:  Bradley G Hammill; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow; Kevin A Schulman; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.