Literature DB >> 19556680

Assessment of gliosis around moveable implants in the brain.

Paula Stice1, Jit Muthuswamy.   

Abstract

Repositioning microelectrodes post-implantation is emerging as a promising approach to achieve long-term reliability in single neuronal recordings. The main goal of this study was to (a) assess glial reaction in response to movement of microelectrodes in the brain post-implantation and (b) determine an optimal window of time post-implantation when movement of microelectrodes within the brain would result in minimal glial reaction. Eleven Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with two microelectrodes each that could be moved in vivo post-implantation. Three cohorts were investigated: (1) microelectrode moved at day 2 (n = 4 animals), (2) microelectrode moved at day 14 (n = 5 animals) and (3) microelectrode moved at day 28 (n = 2 animals). Histological evaluation was performed in cohorts 1-3 at four-week post-movement (30 days, 42 days and 56 days post-implantation, respectively). In addition, five control animals were implanted with microelectrodes that were not moved. Control animals were implanted for (1) 30 days (n = 1), (2) 42 days (n = 2) and (3) 56 days (n = 2) prior to histological evaluation. Quantitative assessment of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) around the tip of the microelectrodes demonstrated that GFAP levels were similar around microelectrodes moved at day 2 when compared to the 30-day controls. However, GFAP expression levels around microelectrode tips that moved at day 14 and day 28 were significantly less than those around control microelectrodes implanted for 42 and 56 days, respectively. Therefore, we conclude that moving microelectrodes after implantation is a viable strategy that does not result in any additional damage to brain tissue. Further, moving the microelectrode downwards after 14 days of implantation may actually reduce the levels of GFAP expression around the tips of the microelectrodes in the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19556680      PMCID: PMC2813571          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/6/4/046004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  48 in total

1.  Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  J C Williams; R L Rennaker; D R Kipke
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Protoc       Date:  1999-12

2.  Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Miguel A L Nicolelis; Dragan Dimitrov; Jose M Carmena; Roy Crist; Gary Lehew; Jerald D Kralik; Steven P Wise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A multi-channel, implantable microdrive system for use with sharp, ultra-fine "Reitboeck" microelectrodes.

Authors:  Harvey A Swadlow; Yulia Bereshpolova; Tatiana Bezdudnaya; Monica Cano; Carl R Stoelzel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull.

Authors:  Roy Biran; Dave C Martin; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Effects of insertion conditions on tissue strain and vascular damage during neuroprosthetic device insertion.

Authors:  C S Bjornsson; S J Oh; Y A Al-Kofahi; Y J Lim; K L Smith; J N Turner; S De; B Roysam; W Shain; S J Kim
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  A new multi-electrode array design for chronic neural recording, with independent and automatic hydraulic positioning.

Authors:  T Sato; T Suzuki; K Mabuchi
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability.

Authors:  P J Rousche; D S Pellinen; D P Pivin; J C Williams; R J Vetter; D R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Three-dimensional hydrogel cultures for modeling changes in tissue impedance around microfabricated neural probes.

Authors:  J P Frampton; M R Hynd; J C Williams; M L Shuler; W Shain
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Rabbit and monkey visual cortex: more than a year of recording with up to 64 microelectrodes.

Authors:  I Porada; I Bondar; W B Spatz; J Krüger
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2000-01-31       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Cerebral astrocyte response to micromachined silicon implants.

Authors:  J N Turner; W Shain; D H Szarowski; M Andersen; S Martins; M Isaacson; H Craighead
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  13 in total

1.  A system for recording neural activity chronically and simultaneously from multiple cortical and subcortical regions in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Joseph Feingold; Theresa M Desrochers; Naotaka Fujii; Ray Harlan; Patrick L Tierney; Hideki Shimazu; Ken-Ichi Amemori; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A method for measuring brain partial pressure of oxygen in unanesthetized unrestrained subjects: the effect of acute and chronic hypoxia on brain tissue PO(2).

Authors:  E Ortiz-Prado; Siraj Natah; Sathyanarayanan Srinivasan; Jeff F Dunn
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Long-term changes in the material properties of brain tissue at the implant-tissue interface.

Authors:  Arati Sridharan; Subramaniam D Rajan; Jit Muthuswamy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Adaptive movable neural interfaces for monitoring single neurons in the brain.

Authors:  Jit Muthuswamy; Sindhu Anand; Arati Sridharan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Distribution and Morphology of Calcium-Binding Proteins Immunoreactive Neurons following Chronic Tungsten Multielectrode Implants.

Authors:  Marco Aurelio M Freire; Jean Faber; Nelson Alessandretti M Lemos; Jose Ronaldo Santos; Pedro França Cavalcanti; Ramon Hypolito Lima; Edgard Morya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  In vivo characterization of the electrophysiological and astrocytic responses to a silicon neuroprobe implanted in the mouse neocortex.

Authors:  Katrien Mols; Silke Musa; Bart Nuttin; Liesbet Lagae; Vincent Bonin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Modeling the Insertion Mechanics of Flexible Neural Probes Coated with Sacrificial Polymers for Optimizing Probe Design.

Authors:  Sagar Singh; Meng-Chen Lo; Vinod B Damodaran; Hilton M Kaplan; Joachim Kohn; Jeffrey D Zahn; David I Shreiber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  In vivo Characterization of Amorphous Silicon Carbide As a Biomaterial for Chronic Neural Interfaces.

Authors:  Gretchen L Knaack; Daniel G McHail; German Borda; Beomseo Koo; Nathalia Peixoto; Stuart F Cogan; Theodore C Dumas; Joseph J Pancrazio
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Cellular-scale probes enable stable chronic subsecond monitoring of dopamine neurochemicals in a rodent model.

Authors:  Helen N Schwerdt; Elizabeth Zhang; Min Jung Kim; Tomoko Yoshida; Lauren Stanwicks; Satoko Amemori; Huseyin E Dagdeviren; Robert Langer; Michael J Cima; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-09-12

Review 10.  State-of-the-art MEMS and microsystem tools for brain research.

Authors:  John P Seymour; Fan Wu; Kensall D Wise; Euisik Yoon
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 7.127

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.