Literature DB >> 19536449

Evolutionary dynamics of recently duplicated genes: Selective constraints on diverging paralogs in the Drosophila pseudoobscura genome.

Richard P Meisel1.   

Abstract

Duplicated genes produce genetic variation that can influence the evolution of genomes and phenotypes. In most cases, for a duplicated gene to contribute to evolutionary novelty it must survive the early stages of divergence from its paralog without becoming a pseudogene. I examined the evolutionary dynamics of recently duplicated genes in the Drosophila pseudoobscura genome to understand the factors affecting these early stages of evolution. Paralogs located in closer proximity have higher sequence identity. This suggests that gene conversion occurs more often between duplications in close proximity or that there is more genetic independence between distant paralogs. Partially duplicated genes have a higher likelihood of pseudogenization than completely duplicated genes, but no single factor significantly contributes to the selective constraints on a completely duplicated gene. However, DNA-based duplications and duplications within chromosome arms tend to produce longer duplication tracts than retroposed and inter-arm duplications, and longer duplication tracts are more likely to contain a completely duplicated gene. Therefore, the relative position of paralogs and the mechanism of duplication indirectly affect whether a duplicated gene is retained or pseudogenized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19536449     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-009-9254-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  66 in total

Review 1.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

Authors:  A Force; M Lynch; F B Pickett; A Amores; Y L Yan; J Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mastering seeds for genomic size nucleotide BLAST searches.

Authors:  Valer Gotea; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Wojciech Makałowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The altered evolutionary trajectories of gene duplicates.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Vaishali Katju
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution.

Authors:  Xionglei He; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Not born equal: increased rate asymmetry in relocated and retrotransposed rodent gene duplicates.

Authors:  Brian P Cusack; Kenneth H Wolfe
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Pseudogenes in yeast?

Authors:  G R Fink
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-04-10       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Consistent patterns of rate asymmetry and gene loss indicate widespread neofunctionalization of yeast genes after whole-genome duplication.

Authors:  Kevin P Byrne; Kenneth H Wolfe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast.

Authors:  Balázs Papp; Csaba Pál; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Identification of pseudogenes in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Paul M Harrison; Duncan Milburn; Zhaolei Zhang; Paul Bertone; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Gene family evolution across 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Matthew W Hahn; Mira V Han; Sang-Gook Han
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  11 in total

1.  Adaptive evolution of genes duplicated from the Drosophila pseudoobscura neo-X chromosome.

Authors:  Richard P Meisel; Benedict B Hilldorfer; Jessica L Koch; Steven Lockton; Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Genome-wide analysis of retrogene polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; Kristian Stevens; Charis M Cardeño; Charles H Langley; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A complex suite of forces drives gene traffic from Drosophila X chromosomes.

Authors:  Richard P Meisel; Mira V Han; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  Spinning gland transcriptomics from two main clades of spiders (order: Araneae)--insights on their molecular, anatomical and behavioral evolution.

Authors:  Francisco Prosdocimi; Daniela Bittencourt; Felipe Rodrigues da Silva; Matias Kirst; Paulo C Motta; Elibio L Rech
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Annelid Distal-less/Dlx duplications reveal varied post-duplication fates.

Authors:  Carmel McDougall; Natalia Korchagina; Jonathan L Tobin; David Ek Ferrier
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Early evolutionary history and genomic features of gene duplicates in the human genome.

Authors:  Lijing Bu; Vaishali Katju
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Gene duplication and ectopic gene conversion in Drosophila.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Comparative genomics of the fungal pathogens Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans.

Authors:  Andrew P Jackson; John A Gamble; Tim Yeomans; Gary P Moran; David Saunders; David Harris; Martin Aslett; Jamie F Barrell; Geraldine Butler; Francesco Citiulo; David C Coleman; Piet W J de Groot; Tim J Goodwin; Michael A Quail; Jacqueline McQuillan; Carol A Munro; Arnab Pain; Russell T Poulter; Marie-Adèle Rajandream; Hubert Renauld; Martin J Spiering; Adrian Tivey; Neil A R Gow; Barclay Barrell; Derek J Sullivan; Matthew Berriman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  In with the old, in with the new: the promiscuity of the duplication process engenders diverse pathways for novel gene creation.

Authors:  Vaishali Katju
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-09-13

10.  To the beat of a different drum: determinants implicated in the asymmetric sequence divergence of Caenorhabditis elegans paralogs.

Authors:  Vaishali Katju
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.