Literature DB >> 10101175

Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

A Force1, M Lynch, F B Pickett, A Amores, Y L Yan, J Postlethwait.   

Abstract

The origin of organismal complexity is generally thought to be tightly coupled to the evolution of new gene functions arising subsequent to gene duplication. Under the classical model for the evolution of duplicate genes, one member of the duplicated pair usually degenerates within a few million years by accumulating deleterious mutations, while the other duplicate retains the original function. This model further predicts that on rare occasions, one duplicate may acquire a new adaptive function, resulting in the preservation of both members of the pair, one with the new function and the other retaining the old. However, empirical data suggest that a much greater proportion of gene duplicates is preserved than predicted by the classical model. Here we present a new conceptual framework for understanding the evolution of duplicate genes that may help explain this conundrum. Focusing on the regulatory complexity of eukaryotic genes, we show how complementary degenerative mutations in different regulatory elements of duplicated genes can facilitate the preservation of both duplicates, thereby increasing long-term opportunities for the evolution of new gene functions. The duplication-degeneration-complementation (DDC) model predicts that (1) degenerative mutations in regulatory elements can increase rather than reduce the probability of duplicate gene preservation and (2) the usual mechanism of duplicate gene preservation is the partitioning of ancestral functions rather than the evolution of new functions. We present several examples (including analysis of a new engrailed gene in zebrafish) that appear to be consistent with the DDC model, and we suggest several analytical and experimental approaches for determining whether the complementary loss of gene subfunctions or the acquisition of novel functions are likely to be the primary mechanisms for the preservation of gene duplicates. For a newly duplicated paralog, survival depends on the outcome of the race between entropic decay and chance acquisition of an advantageous regulatory mutation. Sidow 1996(p. 717) On one hand, it may fix an advantageous allele giving it a slightly different, and selectable, function from its original copy. This initial fixation provides substantial protection against future fixation of null mutations, allowing additional mutations to accumulate that refine functional differentiation. Alternatively, a duplicate locus can instead first fix a null allele, becoming a pseudogene. Walsh 1995 (p. 426) Duplicated genes persist only if mutations create new and essential protein functions, an event that is predicted to occur rarely. Nadeau and Sankoff 1997 (p. 1259) Thus overall, with complex metazoans, the major mechanism for retention of ancient gene duplicates would appear to have been the acquisition of novel expression sites for developmental genes, with its accompanying opportunity for new gene roles underlying the progressive extension of development itself. Cooke et al. 1997 (p. 362)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10101175      PMCID: PMC1460548     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  79 in total

1.  DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize.

Authors:  B S Gaut; J F Doebley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome.

Authors:  K H Wolfe; D C Shields
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Linkage relationships of 19 enzyme Loci in maize.

Authors:  M M Goodman; C W Stuber; K Newton; H H Weissinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development.

Authors:  P W Holland; J Garcia-Fernàndez; N A Williams; A Sidow
Journal:  Dev Suppl       Date:  1994

6.  Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map.

Authors:  J H Postlethwait; Y L Yan; M A Gates; S Horne; A Amores; A Brownlie; A Donovan; E S Egan; A Force; Z Gong; C Goutel; A Fritz; R Kelsh; E Knapik; E Liao; B Paw; D Ransom; A Singer; M Thomson; T S Abduljabbar; P Yelick; D Beier; J S Joly; D Larhammar; F Rosa; M Westerfield; L I Zon; S L Johnson; W S Talbot
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Mutations that alter the timing and pattern of cubitus interruptus gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D C Slusarski; C K Motzny; R Holmgren
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  DLX2 (TES1), a homeobox gene of the Distal-less family, assigned to conserved regions on human and mouse chromosomes 2.

Authors:  T Ozçelik; M H Porteus; J L Rubenstein; U Francke
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Comparative genome mapping of Sorghum and maize.

Authors:  R Whitkus; J Doebley; M Lee
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Structure of the zebrafish snail1 gene and its expression in wild-type, spadetail and no tail mutant embryos.

Authors:  C Thisse; B Thisse; T F Schilling; J H Postlethwait
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  1325 in total

1.  Duplicated genes evolve independently after polyploid formation in cotton.

Authors:  R C Cronn; R L Small; J F Wendel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Patterns of chromosomal duplication in maize and their implications for comparative maps of the grasses.

Authors:  B S Gaut
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Zebrafish genetics: the enigma of arrival.

Authors:  M C Fishman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The role of population size, pleiotropy and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of overlapping gene functions.

Authors:  A Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Vertebrate innovations.

Authors:  S M Shimeld; P W Holland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate.

Authors:  M Lynch; M O'Hely; B Walsh; A Force
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Multiple snoRNA gene clusters from Arabidopsis.

Authors:  J W Brown; G P Clark; D J Leader; C G Simpson; T Lowe
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Wanda: a database of duplicated fish genes.

Authors:  Yves Van de Peer; John S Taylor; Jayabalan Joseph; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Through a genome, darkly: comparative analysis of plant chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  Graham J King
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Long-term microclimatic stress causes rapid adaptive radiation of kaiABC clock gene family in a cyanobacterium, Nostoc linckia, from "Evolution Canyons" I and II, Israel.

Authors:  Volodymyr Dvornyk; Oxana Vinogradova; Eviatar Nevo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.