Literature DB >> 20351054

Adaptive evolution of genes duplicated from the Drosophila pseudoobscura neo-X chromosome.

Richard P Meisel1, Benedict B Hilldorfer, Jessica L Koch, Steven Lockton, Stephen W Schaeffer.   

Abstract

Drosophila X chromosomes are disproportionate sources of duplicated genes, and these duplications are usually the result of retrotransposition of X-linked genes to the autosomes. The excess duplication is thought to be driven by natural selection for two reasons: X chromosomes are inactivated during spermatogenesis, and the derived copies of retroposed duplications tend to be testis expressed. Therefore, autosomal derived copies of retroposed genes provide a mechanism for their X-linked paralogs to "escape" X inactivation. Once these duplications have fixed, they may then be selected for male-specific functions. Throughout the evolution of the Drosophila genus, autosomes have fused with X chromosomes along multiple lineages giving rise to neo-X chromosomes. There has also been excess duplication from the two independent neo-X chromosomes that have been examined--one that occurred prior to the common ancestor of the willistoni species group and another that occurred along the lineage leading to Drosophila pseudoobscura. To determine what role natural selection plays in the evolution of genes duplicated from the D. pseudoobscura neo-X chromosome, we analyzed DNA sequence divergence between paralogs, polymorphism within each copy, and the expression profiles of these duplicated genes. We found that the derived copies of all duplicated genes have elevated nonsynonymous polymorphism, suggesting that they are under relaxed selective constraints. The derived copies also tend to have testis- or male-biased expression profiles regardless of their chromosome of origin. Genes duplicated from the neo-X chromosome appear to be under less constraints than those duplicated from other chromosome arms. We also find more evidence for historical adaptive evolution in genes duplicated from the neo-X chromosome, suggesting that they are under a unique selection regime in which elevated nonsynonymous polymorphism provides a large reservoir of functional variants, some of which are fixed by natural selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20351054      PMCID: PMC2915643          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  100 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 2.  Sexual antagonism and X inactivation--the SAXI hypothesis.

Authors:  Chung I Wu; Eugene Yujun Xu
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Not born equal: increased rate asymmetry in relocated and retrotransposed rodent gene duplicates.

Authors:  Brian P Cusack; Kenneth H Wolfe
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Escape from adaptive conflict after duplication in an anthocyanin pathway gene.

Authors:  David L Des Marais; Mark D Rausher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The estimation of the number and the length distribution of gene conversion tracts from population DNA sequence data.

Authors:  E Betrán; J Rozas; A Navarro; A Barbadilla
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Meiosis in Drosophila: seeing is believing.

Authors:  T L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Demasculinization of X chromosomes in the Drosophila genus.

Authors:  David Sturgill; Yu Zhang; Michael Parisi; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression.

Authors:  Michael Parisi; Rachel Nuttall; Daniel Naiman; Gerard Bouffard; James Malley; Justen Andrews; Scott Eastman; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Cloning of DNA sequences from the white locus of D. melanogaster by a novel and general method.

Authors:  P M Bingham; R Levis; G M Rubin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  11 in total

1.  Inferring the history of interchromosomal gene transposition in Drosophila using n-dimensional parsimony.

Authors:  Mira V Han; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genes Relocated Between Drosophila Chromosome Arms Evolve Under Relaxed Selective Constraints Relative to Non-Relocated Genes.

Authors:  Margaret L I Hart; Ban L Vu; Quinten Bolden; Keith T Chen; Casey L Oakes; Lejla Zoronjic; Richard P Meisel
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Evaluation of different reference based annotation strategies using RNA-Seq - a case study in Drososphila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Nicola Palmieri; Viola Nolte; Anton Suvorov; Carolin Kosiol; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Gene duplication and ectopic gene conversion in Drosophila.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Antagonistic evolution of an antibiotic and its molecular chaperone: how to maintain a vital ectosymbiosis in a highly fluctuating habitat.

Authors:  Claire Papot; François Massol; Didier Jollivet; Aurélie Tasiemski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Widespread gene duplication and adaptive evolution in the RNA interference pathways of the Drosophila obscura group.

Authors:  Danang Crysnanto; Darren J Obbard
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Gene Family Evolution in the Pea Aphid Based on Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly.

Authors:  Yiyuan Li; Hyunjin Park; Thomas E Smith; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Sex and speciation: Drosophila reproductive tract proteins- twenty five years later.

Authors:  Rama Singh; Santosh Jagadeeshan
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-10-17

9.  To the beat of a different drum: determinants implicated in the asymmetric sequence divergence of Caenorhabditis elegans paralogs.

Authors:  Vaishali Katju
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Functional requirements driving the gene duplication in 12 Drosophila species.

Authors:  Yan Zhong; Yanxiao Jia; Yang Gao; Dacheng Tian; Sihai Yang; Xiaohui Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.