Literature DB >> 12560500

Identification of pseudogenes in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Paul M Harrison1, Duncan Milburn, Zhaolei Zhang, Paul Bertone, Mark Gerstein.   

Abstract

Pseudogenes are copies of genes that cannot produce a protein. They can be detected from disruptions to their apparent coding sequence, caused by frameshifts and premature stop codons. They are classed as either processed pseudogenes (made by reverse transcription from an mRNA) or duplicated pseudogenes, arising from duplication in the genomic DNA and subsequent disablement. Historically, there is anecdotal evidence that the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) has few pseudogenes. Investigators have linked this to a high deletion rate of genomic DNA, for which there is evidence from genetic experiments on genome size. Here, we apply a homology-based pipeline that was developed previously to identify pseudogenes in other eukaryotic genomes, to the fruit fly, so as to derive the first complete survey of its pseudogene population. We find approximately 100 pseudogenes, with at least a sixth of these as candidate processed pseudogenes. This gives a much lower proportion of pseudogenes (compared with the size of the proteome) than in the genomes of other eukaryotes for which data are available (human, nematode and budding yeast). Closest matching proteins to Drosophila pseudogenes are significantly longer than the average protein in its proteome (up to approximately 60% more than the average protein's length), in contrast to the situation in the three other eukaryotic genomes. This may be due to the persistence of fragments of longer genes. In the fly pseudogene population, we found most pseudogenes for serine proteases (which are more abundant in the Drosophila lineage compared with the other eukaryotes), immunoglobulin-motif-containing proteins and cytochromes P450. Data on the sequences and positions of the putative pseudogenes are available at: http://www.pseudogene.org/fly. The detection of a small number of pseudogenes in the Drosophila genome and the higher mean length for the closest matching proteins to pseudogenes (possibly because remnants of genes encoding longer proteins are more likely to persist) are further evidence for a high deletion rate of genomic DNA in the fruit fly. The data are useful for molecular evolution study in Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12560500      PMCID: PMC149191          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  26 in total

Review 1.  Vertebrate pseudogenes.

Authors:  A J Mighell; N R Smith; P A Robinson; A F Markham
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2000-02-25       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Pseudogene evolution and natural selection for a compact genome.

Authors:  D A Petrov; D L Hartl
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Two large families of chemoreceptor genes in the nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae reveal extensive gene duplication, diversification, movement, and intron loss.

Authors:  H M Robertson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  The evolution of an alpha-esterase pseudogene inactivated in the Drosophila melanogaster lineage.

Authors:  G C Robin; R J Russell; D J Cutler; J G Oakeshott
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Human LINE retrotransposons generate processed pseudogenes.

Authors:  C Esnault; J Maestre; T Heidmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Origin of new genes and source for N-terminal domain of the chimerical gene, jingwei, in Drosophila.

Authors:  M Long; W Wang; J Zhang
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1999-09-30       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  The large srh family of chemoreceptor genes in Caenorhabditis nematodes reveals processes of genome evolution involving large duplications and deletions and intron gains and losses.

Authors:  H M Robertson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Osa associates with the Brahma chromatin remodeling complex and promotes the activation of some target genes.

Authors:  R T Collins; T Furukawa; N Tanese; J E Treisman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M D Adams; S E Celniker; R A Holt; C A Evans; J D Gocayne; P G Amanatides; S E Scherer; P W Li; R A Hoskins; R F Galle; R A George; S E Lewis; S Richards; M Ashburner; S N Henderson; G G Sutton; J R Wortman; M D Yandell; Q Zhang; L X Chen; R C Brandon; Y H Rogers; R G Blazej; M Champe; B D Pfeiffer; K H Wan; C Doyle; E G Baxter; G Helt; C R Nelson; G L Gabor; J F Abril; A Agbayani; H J An; C Andrews-Pfannkoch; D Baldwin; R M Ballew; A Basu; J Baxendale; L Bayraktaroglu; E M Beasley; K Y Beeson; P V Benos; B P Berman; D Bhandari; S Bolshakov; D Borkova; M R Botchan; J Bouck; P Brokstein; P Brottier; K C Burtis; D A Busam; H Butler; E Cadieu; A Center; I Chandra; J M Cherry; S Cawley; C Dahlke; L B Davenport; P Davies; B de Pablos; A Delcher; Z Deng; A D Mays; I Dew; S M Dietz; K Dodson; L E Doup; M Downes; S Dugan-Rocha; B C Dunkov; P Dunn; K J Durbin; C C Evangelista; C Ferraz; S Ferriera; W Fleischmann; C Fosler; A E Gabrielian; N S Garg; W M Gelbart; K Glasser; A Glodek; F Gong; J H Gorrell; Z Gu; P Guan; M Harris; N L Harris; D Harvey; T J Heiman; J R Hernandez; J Houck; D Hostin; K A Houston; T J Howland; M H Wei; C Ibegwam; M Jalali; F Kalush; G H Karpen; Z Ke; J A Kennison; K A Ketchum; B E Kimmel; C D Kodira; C Kraft; S Kravitz; D Kulp; Z Lai; P Lasko; Y Lei; A A Levitsky; J Li; Z Li; Y Liang; X Lin; X Liu; B Mattei; T C McIntosh; M P McLeod; D McPherson; G Merkulov; N V Milshina; C Mobarry; J Morris; A Moshrefi; S M Mount; M Moy; B Murphy; L Murphy; D M Muzny; D L Nelson; D R Nelson; K A Nelson; K Nixon; D R Nusskern; J M Pacleb; M Palazzolo; G S Pittman; S Pan; J Pollard; V Puri; M G Reese; K Reinert; K Remington; R D Saunders; F Scheeler; H Shen; B C Shue; I Sidén-Kiamos; M Simpson; M P Skupski; T Smith; E Spier; A C Spradling; M Stapleton; R Strong; E Sun; R Svirskas; C Tector; R Turner; E Venter; A H Wang; X Wang; Z Y Wang; D A Wassarman; G M Weinstock; J Weissenbach; S M Williams; K C Worley; D Wu; S Yang; Q A Yao; J Ye; R F Yeh; J S Zaveri; M Zhan; G Zhang; Q Zhao; L Zheng; X H Zheng; F N Zhong; W Zhong; X Zhou; S Zhu; X Zhu; H O Smith; R A Gibbs; E W Myers; G M Rubin; J C Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  39 in total

1.  Millions of years of evolution preserved: a comprehensive catalog of the processed pseudogenes in the human genome.

Authors:  Zhaolei Zhang; Paul M Harrison; Yin Liu; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  A new role for expressed pseudogenes as ncRNA: regulation of mRNA stability of its homologous coding gene.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Yano; Rintaro Saito; Noriyuki Yoshida; Atsushi Yoshiki; Anthony Wynshaw-Boris; Masaru Tomita; Shinji Hirotsune
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison.

Authors:  Daniel L Halligan; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genome-scale analysis of positionally relocated genes.

Authors:  Arjun Bhutkar; Susan M Russo; Temple F Smith; William M Gelbart
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Molecular spectrum of spontaneous de novo mutations in male and female germline cells of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Yutaka Watanabe; Aya Takahashi; Masanobu Itoh; Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Endo-siRNAs depend on a new isoform of loquacious and target artificially introduced, high-copy sequences.

Authors:  Julia Verena Hartig; Stephanie Esslinger; Romy Böttcher; Kuniaki Saito; Klaus Förstemann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Evolutionary dynamics of recently duplicated genes: Selective constraints on diverging paralogs in the Drosophila pseudoobscura genome.

Authors:  Richard P Meisel
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Burst of young retrogenes and independent retrogene formation in mammals.

Authors:  Deng Pan; Liqing Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Expression profiling of Drosophila mitochondrial genes via deep mRNA sequencing.

Authors:  Tatiana Teixeira Torres; Marlies Dolezal; Christian Schlötterer; Birgit Ottenwälder
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  An atlas of the speed of copy number changes in animal gene families and its implications.

Authors:  Deng Pan; Liqing Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.