Literature DB >> 19535590

Representing the forest before the trees: a global advantage effect in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Arun P Sripati1, Carl R Olson.   

Abstract

Hierarchical stimuli (large shapes composed of small shapes) have long been used to study how humans perceive the global and the local content of a scene--the forest and the trees. Studies using these stimuli have revealed a global advantage effect: humans consistently report global shape faster than local shape. The neuronal underpinnings of this effect remain unclear. Here we demonstrate a correlate and possible mechanism in monkey inferotemporal cortex (IT). Inferotemporal neurons signal the global content of a hierarchical display approximately 30 ms before they signal its local content. This is a specific expression of a general principle, related to spatial scale or spatial frequency rather than to hierarchical level, whereby the representation of a large shape develops in IT before that of a small shape. These findings provide support for a coarse-to-fine model of visual scene representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19535590      PMCID: PMC2761674          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5766-08.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  60 in total

1.  Representation of regular and irregular shapes in macaque inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Greet Kayaert; Irving Biederman; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara; Lesley J Rogers
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Multiple object response normalization in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Davide Zoccolan; David D Cox; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Differences in onset latency of macaque inferotemporal neural responses to primate and non-primate faces.

Authors:  Roozbeh Kiani; Hossein Esteky; Keiji Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys.

Authors:  E Kobatake; G Wang; K Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey to band-pass spatial frequency filtered faces.

Authors:  E T Rolls; G C Baylis; M E Hasselmo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Configural processing in autism and its relationship to face processing.

Authors:  Marlene Behrmann; Galia Avidan; Grace Lee Leonard; Rutie Kimchi; Beatriz Luna; Kate Humphreys; Nancy Minshew
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Local advantage in the visual processing of hierarchical stimuli following manipulations of stimulus size and element numerosity in monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Giovanna Spinozzi; Carlo De Lillo; Valeria Salvi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex.

Authors:  Y Sugase; S Yamane; S Ueno; K Kawano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A comparative analysis of global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young children (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Carlo De Lillo; Giovanna Spinozzi; Valentina Truppa; Donna M Naylor
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  19 in total

1.  Responses to compound objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex: the whole is equal to the sum of the discrete parts.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Do Primates and Deep Artificial Neural Networks Perform Object Categorization in a Similar Manner?

Authors:  Prabaha Gangopadhyay; Jhilik Das
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Similarity relations in visual search predict rapid visual categorization.

Authors:  Krithika Mohan; S P Arun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Neural mechanism of dynamic responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex in face perception.

Authors:  Yuichiro Yamada; Yoshiki Kashimori
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Differences between neural activity in prefrontal cortex and striatum during learning of novel abstract categories.

Authors:  Evan G Antzoulatos; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Humans and monkeys share visual representations.

Authors:  Denis Fize; Maxime Cauchoix; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Robust expertise effects in right FFA.

Authors:  Rankin Williams McGugin; Allen T Newton; John C Gore; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Bilateral theta-burst TMS to influence global gestalt perception.

Authors:  Bernd Ritzinger; Elisabeth Huberle; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.