Literature DB >> 15982159

A comparative analysis of global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young children (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Cebus apella).

Carlo De Lillo1, Giovanna Spinozzi, Valentina Truppa, Donna M Naylor.   

Abstract

Results obtained with preschool children (Homo sapiens) were compared with results previously obtained from capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in matching-to-sample tasks featuring hierarchical visual stimuli. In Experiment 1, monkeys, in contrast with children, showed an advantage in matching the stimuli on the basis of their local features. These results were replicated in a 2nd experiment in which control trials enabled the authors to rule out that children used spurious cues to solve the matching task. In a 3rd experiment featuring conditions in which the density of the stimuli was manipulated, monkeys' accuracy in the processing of the global shape of the stimuli was negatively affected by the separation of the local elements, whereas children's performance was robust across testing conditions. Children's response latencies revealed a global precedence in the 2nd and 3rd experiments. These results show differences in the processing of hierarchical stimuli by humans and monkeys that emerge early during childhood. 2005 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982159     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  13 in total

1.  Global and local processing in adult humans (Homo sapiens), 5-year-old children (Homo sapiens), and adult cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Julie J Neiworth; Amy J Gleichman; Anne S Olinick; Kristen E Lamp
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Local and global auditory processing: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Exploring whether nonhuman primates show a bias to overestimate dense quantities.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Brielle T James; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Analogical reasoning and the differential outcome effect: transitory bridging of the conceptual gap for rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Timothy M Flemming; Roger K R Thompson; Michael J Beran; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-07

5.  Set size, individuation, and attention to shape.

Authors:  Lisa Cantrell; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-17

6.  A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Aagten-Murphy; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  From local to global processing: the development of illusory contour perception.

Authors:  Kritika Nayar; John Franchak; Karen Adolph; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-12-13

8.  Reproductive parameters of a captive colony of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) from 1984 to 2006.

Authors:  Annarita Wirz; M Cristina Riviello
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.163

9.  Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.478

10.  Representing the forest before the trees: a global advantage effect in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.