Literature DB >> 23092947

Similarity relations in visual search predict rapid visual categorization.

Krithika Mohan1, S P Arun.   

Abstract

How do we perform rapid visual categorization?It is widely thought that categorization involves evaluating the similarity of an object to other category items, but the underlying features and similarity relations remain unknown. Here, we hypothesized that categorization performance is based on perceived similarity relations between items within and outside the category. To this end, we measured the categorization performance of human subjects on three diverse visual categories (animals, vehicles, and tools) and across three hierarchical levels (superordinate, basic, and subordinate levels among animals). For the same subjects, we measured their perceived pair-wise similarities between objects using a visual search task. Regardless of category and hierarchical level, we found that the time taken to categorize an object could be predicted using its similarity to members within and outside its category. We were able to account for several classic categorization phenomena, such as (a) the longer times required to reject category membership; (b) the longer times to categorize atypical objects; and (c) differences in performance across tasks and across hierarchical levels. These categorization times were also accounted for by a model that extracts coarse structure from an image. The striking agreement observed between categorization and visual search suggests that these two disparate tasks depend on a shared coarse object representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23092947      PMCID: PMC3586997          DOI: 10.1167/12.11.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  70 in total

Review 1.  Models of object recognition.

Authors:  M Riesenhuber; T Poggio
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Integrated model of visual processing.

Authors:  J Bullier
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-10

3.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Phase noise and the classification of natural images.

Authors:  Felix A Wichmann; Doris I Braun; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Functional compartmentalization and viewpoint generalization within the macaque face-processing system.

Authors:  Winrich A Freiwald; Doris Y Tsao
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Rapid categorization of achromatic natural scenes: how robust at very low contrasts?

Authors:  Marc J-M Macé; Simon J Thorpe; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Perceptual categorization of cat and dog silhouettes by 3- to 4-month-old infants.

Authors:  P C Quinn; P D Eimas; M J Tarr
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2001-05

10.  Visual categorization and object representation in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  N Sigala; F Gabbiani; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  Letter processing in upright bigrams predicts reading fluency variations in children.

Authors:  Aakash Agrawal; Sonali Nag; K V S Hari; S P Arun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  Effect of silhouetting and inversion on view invariance in the monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  N Apurva Ratan Murty; S P Arun
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Explaining the Timing of Natural Scene Understanding with a Computational Model of Perceptual Categorization.

Authors:  Imri Sofer; Sébastien M Crouzet; Thomas Serre
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Symmetric Objects Become Special in Perception Because of Generic Computations in Neurons.

Authors:  R T Pramod; S P Arun
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-12-08

5.  The nature of the animacy organization in human ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Sushrut Thorat; Daria Proklova; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Turning visual search time on its head.

Authors:  S P Arun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  How the forest interacts with the trees: Multiscale shape integration explains global and local processing.

Authors:  Georgin Jacob; S P Arun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.