Literature DB >> 16169097

Local advantage in the visual processing of hierarchical stimuli following manipulations of stimulus size and element numerosity in monkeys (Cebus apella).

Giovanna Spinozzi1, Carlo De Lillo, Valeria Salvi.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that monkeys process local elements of hierarchical visual patterns more quickly and more accurately than they process the global shape. These results could be indicative of differences between relatively high visual functions of humans and non-human primates. It is, however, important to rule out that relatively low-level factors can explain these differences. We addressed this issue with two experiments carried out on capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) using matching-to-sample tasks featuring hierarchical stimuli. The first experiment assessed whether manipulations of stimulus size can affect the local advantage so far observed in this New World monkey species. An overall local versus global advantage still emerges in capuchins, irrespectively of the amplitude of the visual angle subtended by the hierarchical shapes. Moreover, a local-to-global interference, indicative of a strong local advantage, was observed for the first time. In the second experiment, we manipulated size and numerosity of the local elements of hierarchical patterns, mimicking procedures that in human perception relegate the local elements to texture and enhance a global advantage. Our results show that in capuchin monkeys, a local advantage emerges clearly even when these procedures are used. These results are of interest since extensive neurophysiological research is carried out on non-human primate vision, often taking for granted a similarity of visual skills in human and non-human primates. These behavioural results show that this assumption is not always warranted and that more research is needed to clarify the differences in the processes involved in basic visual skills among primates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16169097     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.06.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  First- and second-order configural sensitivity for greeble stimuli in baboons.

Authors:  Carole Parron; Joël Fagot
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: Pigeons (Columba livia) and crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) do not perceive emergent configurations.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Representing the forest before the trees: a global advantage effect in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  A comparative psychophysical approach to visual perception in primates.

Authors:  Toyomi Matsuno; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.163

6.  Differences between chimpanzees and humans in visual temporal integration.

Authors:  Tomoko Imura; Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.