Literature DB >> 19531875

Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke.

D J Edwards1, H I Krebs, A Rykman, J Zipse, G W Thickbroom, F L Mastaglia, A Pascual-Leone, B T Volpe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can transiently increase corticomotor excitability of intrinsic hand muscles and improve upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke. As a preliminary study, we tested whether increased corticomotor excitability would be similarly observed in muscles acting about the wrist, and remain present during robotic training involving active wrist movements, in six chronic stroke patients with residual motor deficit.
METHODS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) generated motor evoked potentials (MEP) in the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and provided a measure of corticomotor excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) before and immediately after a period of tDCS (1 mA, 20 min, anode and TMS applied to the lesioned hemisphere), and robotic wrist training (1hr).
RESULTS: Following tDCS, the same TMS current strength evoked an increased MEP amplitude (mean 168 +/- 22%SEM; p < 0.05), that remained increased after robot training (166 +/- 23%; p < 0.05). Conditioned MEPs were of significantly lower amplitude relative to unconditioned MEPs prior to tDCS (62 +/- 6%, p < 0.05), but not after tDCS (89 +/- 14%, p = 0.40), or robot training (91 +/- 8%, p = 0.28), suggesting that the increased corticomotor excitability is associated with reduced intracortical inhibition.
CONCLUSION: The persistence of these effects after robotic motor training, indicates that a motor learning and retraining program can co-exist with tDCS-induced changes in cortical motor excitability, and supports the concept of combining brain stimulation with physical therapy to promote recovery after brain injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19531875      PMCID: PMC4510929          DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  58 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex.

Authors:  J N Sanes; J P Donoghue
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?

Authors:  R P S Van Peppen; G Kwakkel; S Wood-Dauphinee; H J M Hendriks; Ph J Van der Wees; J Dekker
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.477

3.  Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Antje Seeber; Kai Frommann; Cornelia Carmen Klein; Christian Rochford; Maren S Nitsche; Kristina Fricke; David Liebetanz; Nicolas Lang; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Short-interval cortical inhibition and corticomotor excitability with fatiguing hand exercise: a central adaptation to fatigue?

Authors:  Nicola M Benwell; Paul Sacco; Geoff R Hammond; Michelle L Byrnes; Frank L Mastaglia; Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Robot-aided functional imaging: application to a motor learning study.

Authors:  H I Krebs; T Brashers-Krug; S L Rauch; C R Savage; N Hogan; R H Rubin; A J Fischman; N M Alpert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Task-dependent changes of intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  J Liepert; J Classen; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The surround inhibition determines therapy-induced cortical reorganization.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Kerstin Haevernick; Cornelius Weiller; Anne Barzel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke.

Authors:  Bruce T Volpe; Mark Ferraro; Daniel Lynch; Paul Christos; Jennifer Krol; Christine Trudell; Hermano I Krebs; Neville Hogan
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Long-term disability after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989-1990.

Authors:  Graeme J Hankey; Konrad Jamrozik; Robyn J Broadhurst; Susanne Forbes; Craig S Anderson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.919

View more
  57 in total

1.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy maps cortical plasticity underlying altered motor performance induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Timea Hodics; Nathan Hervey; George Kondraske; Ann M Stowe; George Alexandrakis
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Safety parameter considerations of anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Dennis Truong; Milene L Brownlow; Jessica A Wagner; R Andy McKinley; Marom Bikson; Ryan Jankord
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  Anodal-tDCS applied during unilateral strength training increases strength and corticospinal excitability in the untrained homologous muscle.

Authors:  Ashlee M Hendy; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Using tDCS to facilitate motor learning in speech production: The role of timing.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald; Holly Calhoun; Stacey Rimikis; Mara Steinberg Lowe; Rebecca Wellner; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 6.  Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations.

Authors:  Berkan Guleyupoglu; Pedro Schestatsky; Dylan Edwards; Felipe Fregni; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 7.  Motor System Reorganization After Stroke: Stimulating and Training Toward Perfection.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-09

8.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS.

Authors:  Dylan Edwards; Mar Cortes; Abhishek Datta; Preet Minhas; Eric M Wassermann; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery.

Authors:  Bruce T Volpe; Patricio T Huerta; Johanna L Zipse; Avrielle Rykman; Dylan Edwards; Laura Dipietro; Neville Hogan; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2009-09

10.  Characterizing the application of transcranial direct current stimulation in human pharyngeal motor cortex.

Authors:  Samantha Jefferson; Satish Mistry; Salil Singh; John Rothwell; Shaheen Hamdy
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.