Literature DB >> 16263058

Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke.

Bruce T Volpe1, Mark Ferraro, Daniel Lynch, Paul Christos, Jennifer Krol, Christine Trudell, Hermano I Krebs, Neville Hogan.   

Abstract

Stroke is the leading cause of permanent disability in the United States despite advances in prevention and novel interventional treatments. Randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of specialized post-stroke rehabilitation units, but administrative orders have severely limited the length of stay, so novel approaches to the treatment of recovery need to be tested in outpatients. Although the mechanisms of stroke recovery depend on multiple factors, a number of techniques that concentrate on enhanced exercise of the paralyzed limb have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing the motor impairment. For example, interactive robotic devices are new tools for therapists to deliver enhanced sensorimotor training for the paralyzed upper limb, which can potentially improve patient outcome and increase patient productivity. New data support the idea that for some post-stroke patients and for some aspects of training-induced recovery, timing of the training may be less important than the quality and intensity of the training. The positive outcome that resulted in the interactive robotic trials contrasts with the failure to find a beneficial result in trials that used a noninteractive device that delivered continuous passive motion only. New pilot data from novel devices to move the wrist demonstrate benefit and suggest that successive improvement of the function of the arm progressing to the distal muscles may eventually lead to significant disability reduction. These data from robotic trials continue to contribute to the emerging scientific basis of neuro-rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16263058     DOI: 10.1007/s11910-005-0035-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep        ISSN: 1528-4042            Impact factor:   5.081


  20 in total

1.  Quantification of anterior translation of the humeral head in the throwing shoulder. Manual assessment versus stress radiography.

Authors:  T S Ellenbecker; A J Mattalino; E Elam; R Caplinger
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation.

Authors:  B T Volpe; H I Krebs; N Hogan; L Edelstein OTR; C Diels; M Aisen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Continuous passive motion (CPM): theory and principles of clinical application.

Authors:  S W O'Driscoll; N J Giori
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

4.  Modulation of practice-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  U Ziemann; W Muellbacher; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  Systematic review of aetiology and treatment of post-stroke hand oedema and shoulder-hand syndrome.

Authors:  A C Geurts; B A Visschers; J van Limbeek; G M Ribbers
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  2000-03

6.  Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  M Ferraro; J J Palazzolo; J Krol; H I Krebs; N Hogan; B T Volpe
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Charles G Burgar; Peggy C Shor; Matra Majmundar; Machiel Van der Loos
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements.

Authors:  James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: from evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation.

Authors:  H I Krebs; B T Volpe; M Ferraro; S Fasoli; J Palazzolo; B Rohrer; L Edelstein; N Hogan
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.119

10.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  26 in total

1.  Longer versus shorter mental practice sessions for affected upper extremity movement after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Kari Dunning; Valerie Hermann; Anthony Leonard; Peter Levine
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.477

2.  Robotic Assistance for Training Finger Movement Using a Hebbian Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Justin B Rowe; Vicky Chan; Morgan L Ingemanson; Steven C Cramer; Eric T Wolbrecht; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Brian R Webster; Pablo A Celnik; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

4.  Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nancy G Kutner; Rebecca Zhang; Andrew J Butler; Steven L Wolf; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-02-25

5.  Movement Anticipation and EEG: Implications for BCI-Contingent Robot Therapy.

Authors:  Sumner Norman; Mark Dennison; Eric Wolbrecht; Steven Cramer; Ramesh Srinivasan; David Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 6.  Stroke-related translational research.

Authors:  Louis R Caplan; Juan Arenillas; Steven C Cramer; Anne Joutel; Eng H Lo; James Meschia; Sean Savitz; Elizabeth Tournier-Lasserve
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2011-05-09

7.  Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke.

Authors:  D J Edwards; H I Krebs; A Rykman; J Zipse; G W Thickbroom; F L Mastaglia; A Pascual-Leone; B T Volpe
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Cortical plasticity following motor skill learning during mental practice in stroke.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Jerzy P Szaflarski; James C Eliassen; Hai Pan; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Teaching Adult Rats Spinalized as Neonates to Walk Using Trunk Robotic Rehabilitation: Elements of Success, Failure, and Dependence.

Authors:  Ubong I Udoekwere; Chintan S Oza; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Error-augmented bimanual therapy for stroke survivors.

Authors:  Farnaz Abdollahi; Molly Corrigan; Emily D C Lazzaro; Robert V Kenyon; James L Patton
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.