Literature DB >> 24942703

Anodal-tDCS applied during unilateral strength training increases strength and corticospinal excitability in the untrained homologous muscle.

Ashlee M Hendy1, Dawson J Kidgell.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the cross-transfer of strength following unilateral training may be modulated by increased corticospinal excitability of the ipsilateral primary motor cortex, due to cross-activation. Anodal-tDCS (a-tDCS) has been shown to acutely increase corticospinal excitability and motor performance, which may enhance this process. Therefore, we sought to examine changes in neural activation and strength of the untrained limb following the application of a-tDCS during a single unilateral strength training session. Ten participants underwent three conditions in a randomized, double-blinded crossover design: (1) strength training + a-tDCS, (2) strength training + sham-tDCS and (3) a-tDCS alone. a-tDCS was applied for 20 min at 2 mA over the right motor cortex. Unilateral strength training of the right wrist involved 4 × 6 wrist extensions at 70 % of maximum. Outcome measures included maximal voluntary strength, corticospinal excitability, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and cross-activation. We observed a significant increase in strength of the untrained wrist (5.27 %), a decrease in short-interval intracortical inhibition (-13.49 %), and an increase in cross-activation (15.71 %) when strength training was performed with a-tDCS, but not following strength training with sham-tDCS, or tDCS alone. Corticospinal excitability of the untrained wrist increased significantly following both strength training with a-tDCS (17.29 %), and a-tDCS alone (15.15 %), but not following strength training with sham-tDCS. These findings suggest that a single session of a-tDCS combined with unilateral strength training of the right limb increases maximal strength and cross-activation to the contralateral untrained limb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24942703     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4016-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  48 in total

1.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J C Keel; M J Smith; E M Wassermann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  Changes in segmental and motor cortical output with contralateral muscle contractions and altered sensory inputs in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Janet L Taylor; Nicolas T Petersen; Gabrielle Russell; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The origin of activity in the biceps brachii muscle during voluntary contractions of the contralateral elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Inge Zijdewind; Jane E Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Interhemispheric plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Sarah Pirio Richardson; Mikhael Lomarev; Ejaz Shamim; Sabine Meunier; Heike Russman; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Irradiation of voluntary activity to the contralateral side in movements of normal subjects and patients with central motor disturbances.

Authors:  H C Hopf; H J Schlegel; K Lowitzsch
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.710

9.  Promoting use-dependent plasticity with externally-paced training.

Authors:  Suzanne J Ackerley; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Wearing a sports compression garment on the performance of visuomotor tracking following eccentric exercise: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alan J Pearce; Dawson J Kidgell; Luke A Grikepelis; John S Carlson
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.319

View more
  18 in total

1.  Cross-education of muscular strength is facilitated by homeostatic plasticity.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Jacqueline Williams; Michael Spittle; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Kevin Thomas; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The corticospinal responses of metronome-paced, but not self-paced strength training are similar to motor skill training.

Authors:  Michael Leung; Timo Rantalainen; Wei-Peng Teo; Dawson Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The ipsilateral corticospinal responses to cross-education are dependent upon the motor-training intervention.

Authors:  Michael Leung; Timo Rantalainen; Wei-Peng Teo; Dawson Kidgell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG): assessing the impact of tDCS on slow cortical magnetic fields.

Authors:  Eliana Garcia-Cossio; Matthias Witkowski; Stephen E Robinson; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Surjo R Soekadar
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Nathan D Nuzum; Ashlee M Hendy; Aaron P Russell; Wei-Peng Teo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The Cross-Education Phenomenon: Brain and Beyond.

Authors:  Ashlee M Hendy; Séverine Lamon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Concurrent exergaming and transcranial direct current stimulation to improve balance in people with Parkinson's disease: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Dale M Harris; Timo Rantalainen; Makii Muthalib; Liam Johnson; Rachel L Duckham; Stuart T Smith; Robin M Daly; Wei-Peng Teo
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Maximum Isometric Force Production during Isometric Barbell Squats.

Authors:  Rouven Kenville; Tom Maudrich; Dennis Maudrich; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-14

10.  Effects of enhanced cutaneous sensory input on interlimb strength transfer of the wrist extensors.

Authors:  Trevor S Barss; Taryn Klarner; Yao Sun; Kristy Inouye; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.