Literature DB >> 24408977

Improving glaucoma detection using spatially correspondent clusters of damage and by combining standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography.

Ali S Raza1, Xian Zhang, Carlos G V De Moraes, Charles A Reisman, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Robert Ritch, Donald C Hood.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To improve the detection of glaucoma, techniques for assessing local patterns of damage and for combining structure and function were developed.
METHODS: Standard automated perimetry (SAP) and frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (fdOCT) data, consisting of macular retinal ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer (mRGCPL) as well as macular and optic disc retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL and dRNFL) thicknesses, were collected from 52 eyes of 52 healthy controls and 156 eyes of 96 glaucoma suspects and patients. In addition to generating simple global metrics, SAP and fdOCT data were searched for contiguous clusters of abnormal points and converted to a continuous metric (pcc). The pcc metric, along with simpler methods, was used to combine the information from the SAP and fdOCT. The performance of different methods was assessed using the area under receiver operator characteristic curves (AROC scores).
RESULTS: The pcc metric performed better than simple global measures for both the fdOCT and SAP. The best combined structure-function metric (mRGCPL&SAP pcc, AROC = 0.868 ± 0.032) was better (statistically significant) than the best metrics for independent measures of structure and function. When SAP was used as part of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, AROC scores increased for all metrics, including the best combined structure-function metric (AROC = 0.975 ± 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: A combined structure-function metric improved the detection of glaucomatous eyes. Overall, the primary sources of value-added for glaucoma detection stem from the continuous cluster search (the pcc), the mRGCPL data, and the combination of structure and function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  detection; diagnosis; glaucoma; glaucomatous; macula; optical coherence tomography; retinal ganglion cells; retinal nerve fiber layer; sensitivity; specificity; standard automated perimetry; visual fields

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24408977      PMCID: PMC3908820          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  53 in total

1.  Asymmetry in hemifield macular thickness as an early indicator of glaucomatous change.

Authors:  Tae Woong Um; Kyung Rim Sung; Gadi Wollstein; Sung-Cheol Yun; Jung Hwa Na; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Macular symmetry testing for glaucoma detection.

Authors:  Harmohina Bagga; David S Greenfield; Robert W Knighton
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Macular assessment using optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Kyung Rim Sung; Gadi Wollstein; Na Rae Kim; Jung Hwa Na; Jessica E Nevins; Chan Yun Kim; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Linking structure and function in glaucoma.

Authors:  R S Harwerth; J L Wheat; M J Fredette; D R Anderson
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Paul Rhee; William J Feuer; John McSoley; Chris A Johnson; Douglas R Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Search for an optimal combination of structural and functional parameters for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Multivariate analysis of confocal scanning laser tomograph, blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer data.

Authors:  K Vihanninjoki; P Teesalu; R O Burk; E Läärä; A Tuulonen; P J Airaksinen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 7.  Diagnosis of glaucoma and detection of glaucoma progression using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Dilraj S Grewal; Angelo P Tanna
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  Estimating the rate of retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Douglas R Anderson; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Ronald S Harwerth; Marie-Josée Fredette; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Ou Tan; Vikas Chopra; Ake Tzu-Hui Lu; Joel S Schuman; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Rohit Varma; David Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  A combined index of structure and function for staging glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Renato Lisboa; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09
View more
  22 in total

1.  Comparative glaucomatous diagnosis using macular optical coherence tomography and perimetry with centrally condensed stimuli: English version.

Authors:  A Sturm; W Noske
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Correlation of morphological and functional glaucoma diagnostics with macular OCT and perimetry with centrally condensed stimuli: German version].

Authors:  A Sturm; W Noske
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Evaluation of Visual Field and Imaging Outcomes for Glaucoma Clinical Trials (An American Ophthalomological Society Thesis).

Authors:  David F Garway-Heath; Ana Quartilho; Philip Prah; David P Crabb; Qian Cheng; Haogang Zhu
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2017-08-22

4.  The Association Between Clinical Features Seen on Fundus Photographs and Glaucomatous Damage Detected on Visual Fields and Optical Coherence Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Paula A Alhadeff; Carlos G De Moraes; Monica Chen; Ali S Raza; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.

Authors:  Laura Wilsey; Sowjanya Gowrisankaran; Grant Cull; Christy Hardin; Claude F Burgoyne; Brad Fortune
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Longitudinal Macular Structure-Function Relationships in Glaucoma and Their Sources of Variability.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Nima Fatehi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Reproducibility of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vascular Density in Glaucoma and Healthy Eyes.

Authors:  Patricia I C Manalastas; Linda M Zangwill; Luke J Saunders; Kaweh Mansouri; Akram Belghith; Min Hee Suh; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Rafaella C Penteado; Tadamichi Akagi; Takuhei Shoji; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in glaucoma clinical trials.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Between-subject variability in asymmetry analysis of macular thickness.

Authors:  Muhammed S Alluwimi; William H Swanson; Victor E Malinovsky
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Optical Coherence Tomography Structural Abnormality Detection in Glaucoma Using Topographically Correspondent Rim and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Criteria.

Authors:  Hongli Yang; Haomin Luo; Christy Hardin; Yaxing Wang; Jin Wook Jeoung; Cindy Albert; Jayme R Vianna; Glen P Sharpe; Juan Reynaud; Shaban Demirel; Steven L Mansberger; Brad Fortune; Marcelo Nicolela; Stuart K Gardiner; Balwantray C Chauhan; Claude F Burgoyne
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.