Literature DB >> 19524478

Sampling the spatial patterns of cancer: optimized biopsy procedures for estimating prostate cancer volume and Gleason Score.

Yangming Ou1, Dinggang Shen, Jianchao Zeng, Leon Sun, Judd Moul, Christos Davatzikos.   

Abstract

Prostate biopsy is the current gold-standard procedure for prostate cancer diagnosis. Existing prostate biopsy procedures have been mostly focusing on detecting cancer presence. However, they often ignore the potential use of biopsy to estimate cancer volume (CV) and Gleason Score (GS, a cancer grade descriptor), the two surrogate markers for cancer aggressiveness and the two crucial factors for treatment planning. To fill up this vacancy, this paper assumes and demonstrates that, by optimally sampling the spatial patterns of cancer, biopsy procedures can be specifically designed for estimating CV and GS. Our approach combines image analysis and machine learning tools in an atlas-based population study that consists of three steps. First, the spatial distributions of cancer in a patient population are learned, by constructing statistical atlases from histological images of prostate specimens with known cancer ground truths. Then, the optimal biopsy locations are determined in a feature selection formulation, so that biopsy outcomes (either cancer presence or absence) at those locations could be used to differentiate, at the best rate, between the existing specimens having different (high vs. low) CV/GS values. Finally, the optimized biopsy locations are utilized to estimate whether a new-coming prostate cancer patient has high or low CV/GS values, based on a binary classification formulation. The estimation accuracy and the generalization ability are evaluated by the classification rates and the associated receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves in cross validations. The optimized biopsy procedures are also designed to be robust to the almost inevitable needle displacement errors in clinical practice, and are found to be robust to variations in the optimization parameters as well as the training populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19524478      PMCID: PMC2748333          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2009.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  32 in total

1.  Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data.

Authors:  T S Furey; N Cristianini; N Duffy; D W Bednarski; M Schummer; D Haussler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  An adaptive-focus statistical shape model for segmentation and shape modeling of 3-D brain structures.

Authors:  D Shen; E H Herskovits; C Davatzikos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?

Authors:  A Manseck; M Froehner; S Oehlschlaeger; O Hakenberg; K Friedrich; F Theissig; M P Wirth
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas and its application in segmentation.

Authors:  Hyunjin Park; Peyton H Bland; Charles R Meyer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling.

Authors:  Alejandro F Frangi; Daniel Rueckert; Julia A Schnabel; Wiro J Niessen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Prostate cancer detection with two sets of ten-core compared with two sets of sextant biopsies.

Authors:  K G Fink; G Hutarew; W Lumper; A Jungwirth; O Dietze; N T Schmeller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  How accurately does prostate biopsy Gleason score predict pathologic findings and disease free survival?

Authors:  V Narain; F J Bianco; D J Grignon; W A Sakr; J E Pontes; D P Wood
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Detection rate of histologically insignificant prostate cancer with systematic sextant biopsies and fine needle aspiration cytology.

Authors:  S H Hautmann; S Conrad; R P Henke; A Erbersdobler; J Simon; M Straub; M Graefen; R E Hautmann; H Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  T J Sebo; B J Bock; J C Cheville; C Lohse; P Wollan; H Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Improved detection of clinically significant, curable prostate cancer with systematic 12-core biopsy.

Authors:  Herb Singh; Eduardo I Canto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Dov Kadmon; Brian J Miles; Thomas M Wheeler; Kevin M Slawin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  11 in total

1.  DRAMMS: Deformable registration via attribute matching and mutual-saliency weighting.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Aristeidis Sotiras; Nikos Paragios; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Deformable MRI-Ultrasound registration using correlation-based attribute matching for brain shift correction: Accuracy and generality in multi-site data.

Authors:  Inês Machado; Matthew Toews; Elizabeth George; Prashin Unadkat; Walid Essayed; Jie Luo; Pedro Teodoro; Herculano Carvalho; Jorge Martins; Polina Golland; Steve Pieper; Sarah Frisken; Alexandra Golby; William Wells Iii; Yangming Ou
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Statistical 3D Prostate Imaging Atlas Construction via Anatomically Constrained Registration.

Authors:  Mirabela Rusu; B Nicolas Bloch; Carl C Jaffe; Neil M Rofsky; Elizabeth M Genega; Ernest Feleppa; Robert E Lenkinski; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-03-13

4.  COMPUTER-AIDED GLEASON GRADING OF PROSTATE CANCER HISTOPATHOLOGICAL IMAGES USING TEXTON FORESTS.

Authors:  Parmeshwar Khurd; Claus Bahlmann; Peter Maday; Ali Kamen; Summer Gibbs-Strauss; Elizabeth M Genega; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-04-17

Review 5.  Prostate focused ultrasound focal therapy--imaging for the future.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Albert Gelet; Sébastien Crouzet; Jean-Yves Chapelon
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Methodology to study the three-dimensional spatial distribution of prostate cancer and their dependence on clinical parameters.

Authors:  Kristians Diaz Rojas; Maria L Montero; Jorge Yao; Edward Messing; Anees Fazili; Jean Joseph; Yangming Ou; Deborah J Rubens; Kevin J Parker; Christos Davatzikos; Benjamin Castaneda
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-07-29

7.  Mining multi-site clinical data to develop machine learning MRI biomarkers: application to neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Rebecca J Weiss; Sara V Bates; Ya'nan Song; Yue Zhang; Emily M Herzberg; Yih-Chieh Chen; Maryann Gong; Isabel Chien; Lily Zhang; Shawn N Murphy; Randy L Gollub; P Ellen Grant; Yangming Ou
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Nuclear morphometry, epigenetic changes, and clinical relevance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Christhunesa S Christudass
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: A propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Chen-Yi Jiang; Peng-Fei Shen; Cheng Wang; Hao-Jun Gui; Yuan Ruan; Hao Zeng; Shu-Jie Xia; Qiang Wei; Fu-Jun Zhao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  A statistical, voxelised model of prostate cancer for biologically optimised radiotherapy.

Authors:  Robert N Finnegan; Hayley M Reynolds; Martin A Ebert; Yu Sun; Lois Holloway; Jonathan R Sykes; Jason Dowling; Catherine Mitchell; Scott G Williams; Declan G Murphy; Annette Haworth
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.