Literature DB >> 10799171

Detection rate of histologically insignificant prostate cancer with systematic sextant biopsies and fine needle aspiration cytology.

S H Hautmann1, S Conrad, R P Henke, A Erbersdobler, J Simon, M Straub, M Graefen, R E Hautmann, H Huland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluate the detection rate of insignificant prostate cancer and the rate of significant prostate cancer overlooked in the results of systematic sextant biopsy and fine needle aspiration biopsy of the prostate of asymptomatic men with serum prostate specific antigen concentrations less than 4.0 ng./ml.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed specimens from 133 consecutive patients with a mean age of 60 years undergoing cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. Six systematic biopsy specimens and 2 fine needle aspiration cytology samples were taken from the prostate immediately after cystoprostatectomy. The specimens were step sectioned and examined for prostate cancer. Insignificant prostate cancer was defined as any cancer with an aggregate volume 0.5 cm.3 or less.
RESULTS: Incidental prostate cancer was found in 58 of the 133 patients (44%). Tumor volume was 0.5 cm.3 or less in 47 cases. Sextant biopsy detected 7 cancers, including 4 of 47 (9%) that were insignificant and 3 of 11 (27%) that were significant. Fine needle aspiration cytology also detected 7 cancers, including 3 (6%) and 4 (36%) that were insignificant and significant, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic sextant biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology each diagnose prostate cancer in about 5% of asymptomatic men who have normal digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen less than 4.0 ng./ml. However, many of the cancers thus detected are insignificant and most of the significant cancers are missed. Therefore, routine screening of such patients with sextant biopsy or aspiration cytology does not appear to be justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10799171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

1.  Is sparing the prostate still considered radical cystectomy? The case against prostate-sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed Kotb; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Sampling the spatial patterns of cancer: optimized biopsy procedures for estimating prostate cancer volume and Gleason Score.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Dinggang Shen; Jianchao Zeng; Leon Sun; Judd Moul; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 3.  Stopping screening, when and how?

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.