Literature DB >> 14767277

Improved detection of clinically significant, curable prostate cancer with systematic 12-core biopsy.

Herb Singh1, Eduardo I Canto, Shahrokh F Shariat, Dov Kadmon, Brian J Miles, Thomas M Wheeler, Kevin M Slawin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While systematic 12-core (S12C) biopsy detects more cancers than sextant biopsy, to our knowledge the clinical significance of these additionally detected tumors has not been established. We studied pathological parameters of prostatectomy specimens from patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer detected with a S12C biopsy to determine the clinical significance of these cancers in comparison with sextant detected cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 179 consecutive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer detected by S12C biopsy were studied. The groups compared consisted of the sextant core subset of the S12C and the entire S12C set. Total tumor volume, Gleason score, organ confined status, surgical margin status, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node involvement, and clinical significance of tumors detected by sextant and by S12C templates were compared.
RESULTS: S12C biopsy detected a greater number of cancers scored as moderate (Gleason score 2 to 6) or high (Gleason score 7 or greater) grade, and cancers of all sizes regardless of organ confined status than the sextant cores alone (all p <0.05). S12C biopsy identified a greater number of biologically significant and insignificant tumors regardless of how they were defined.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the sextant set S12C biopsy detects a significantly greater number of surgically curable, biologically significant tumors as well as those that might be considered clinically insignificant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14767277     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000112763.74119.d4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  26 in total

Review 1.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

4.  Biochemical outcome of small-volume or insignificant prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in Japanese population.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Akiko Okamoto; Atsushi Imai; Tohru Yoneyama; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takahiro Yoneyama; Takuya Koie; Noritaka Kaminura; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Comparison of 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 cores prostate biopsies in the determination of prostate cancer and the importance of prostate volume.

Authors:  Cavit Ceylan; Omer Gokhan Doluoglu; Erdogan Aglamis; Ozkan Baytok
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  The 20-core prostate biopsy as an initial strategy: impact on the detection of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed Amine Jradi; Mohamed Dridi; Mourad Teyeb; Mokhtar Ould Sidi Mohamed; Ramzi Khiary; Samir Ghozzi; Nawfel Ben Rais
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Prostate cancer diagnostics: innovative imaging in case of multiple negative biopsies.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT). Relevance for clinical practice].

Authors:  B J Schmitz-Dräger; C Fischer; E Bismarck; H J Dörsam; G Lümmen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  The importance of prostate volume in prostate needle biopsy.

Authors:  Ömer Gökhan Doluoğlu; Çetin Volkan Öztekin; Mehmet Karabakan; Alp Özgür Akdemir; Mesut Çetinkaya
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-06

Review 10.  Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Paul S Albert; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.