Literature DB >> 649877

A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech.

C L De Filippo, B L Scott.   

Abstract

The "tracking procedure" is a method to train and evaluate the reception of ongoing speech. A talker and a receiver engage in a dialogue for a designated period of time in which the receiver reports his perception of successive segments of read text and is corrected by the talker until the text is repeated verbatim. Performance is measured in number of words of text repeated correctly per unit of time. The procedure is illustrated by its application to a project for training and evaluating use of a vibrotacile-electrotactile aid to lipreading. Differences between experimental conditions are described over time in terms of absolute words per minute, increment of aided over unaided words-per-minute scores, and percent of normal listening rate. Data from identification tests with syllables, words, and sentences are also presented. Tracking is suggested as an additional procedure for communication training in aural rehabilitation or classroom setting, and for evaluation of other communication systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 649877     DOI: 10.1121/1.381827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  FFT-based digital tactile vocoder system for real-time use.

Authors:  O Ozdamar; C N Lopez; D K Oller; R E Eilers; E Miskiel; M P Lynch
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Technologic advances in aural rehabilitation: applications and innovative methods of service delivery.

Authors:  Robert W Sweetow; Jennifer Henderson Sabes
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-06

3.  Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.

Authors:  Geraldine Nogaki; Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  [Audiologic rehabilitation of patients with cochlear implants].

Authors:  S Hoth; J Müller-Deile
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults: A Detailed Analysis of Auditory and Self-Perceived Benefits.

Authors:  Joke Debruyne; Miranda Janssen; Jan Brokx
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Optimizing Performance in Adult Cochlear Implant Users through Clinician Directed Auditory Training.

Authors:  Geoff Plant; Claire Marcus Bernstein; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

7.  Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

8.  Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Thomas M Talavage; Shivank Sinha; Heidi Neuburger; Mahan Azadpour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cochlear implantation in patients with Cogan's syndrome: a review of four cases.

Authors:  M Minet; N Deggouj; M Gersdorff
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Cochlear implants and spoken language processing abilities: review and assessment of the literature.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.