Literature DB >> 26011220

Prognostic factors in peptic ulcer perforations: a retrospective 14-year study.

Mutlu Unver1, Özgür Fırat, Ömer Vedat Ünalp, Alper Uğuz, Tufan Gümüş, Taylan Özgür Sezer, Şafak Öztürk, Tayfun Yoldaş, Sinan Ersin, Adem Güler.   

Abstract

Regarding the complications of peptic ulcer, a perforation remains the most important fatal complication. The aim of our retrospective study was to determine relations between postoperative morbidity and comorbid disease or perioperative risk factors in perforated peptic ulcer. In total, 239 patients who underwent emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in Ege University General Surgery Department, between June 1999 and May 2013 were included in this study. The clinical data concerning the patient characteristics, operative methods, and complications were collected retrospectively. One hundred seventy-five of the 239 patients were male (73.2%) and 64 were female (26.8%). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 1 in the patients without morbidity, but mean ASA score was 3 in the morbidity and mortality groups. Primary suture and omentoplasty was the selected procedure in 228 of the patients. Eleven patients underwent resection. In total, 105 patients (43.9%) had comorbidities. Thirty-seven patients (67.3%) in the morbidity group had comorbid diseases. Thirteen (92.9%) patients in the mortality group had comorbid diseases. Perforation as a complication of peptic ulcer disease still remains among the frequent indications of urgent abdominal surgery. Among the analyzed parameters, age, ASA score, and having comorbid disease were found to have an effect on both mortality and morbidity. The controversial subject in the present study is regarding the duration of symptoms. The duration of symptoms had no effect on mortality nor morbidity in our study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peptic ulcer; Perforation; Prognostic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26011220      PMCID: PMC4452989          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00187.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  39 in total

Review 1.  Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis.

Authors:  C Svanes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Perforated peptic ulcer: long-term results after simple closure in the elderly.

Authors:  L G Blomgren
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulcers in a Danish county 1993-2002: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Annmarie Lassen; Jesper Hallas; Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Prognostic factors of peptic ulcer perforation.

Authors:  Ibrahim Barut; Omer R Tarhan; Celal Cerci; Nejda Karaguzel; Yusuf Akdeniz; Mahmut Bulbul
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Rising frequency of ulcer perforation in elderly people in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Walt; B Katschinski; R Logan; J Ashley; M Langman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Factors contributing to releak after surgical closure of perforated duodenal ulcer by Graham's Patch.

Authors:  K Kumar; D Pai; K Srinivasan; S Jagdish; N Ananthakrishnan
Journal:  Trop Gastroenterol       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

7.  [Ulcer surgery during 1976-1978 and 1986-1988. Significance of H2 blockaders in surgical training].

Authors:  S Meisner; A Sørensen; P A Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1993-11-22

8.  30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit.

Authors:  Anne Nakano; Jørgen Bendix; Sven Adamsen; Daniel Buck; Jan Mainz; Paul Bartels; Bente Nørgård
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-11-30

9.  Analysis of risk factors for postoperative morbidity in perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Jae-Myung Kim; Sang-Ho Jeong; Young-Joon Lee; Soon-Tae Park; Sang-Kyung Choi; Soon-Chan Hong; Eun-Jung Jung; Young-Tae Ju; Chi-Young Jeong; Woo-Song Ha
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.720

10.  The management of large perforations of duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta; Robin Kaushik; Rajeev Sharma; Ashok Attri
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gastroduodenal perforation in the pediatric population: a retrospective analysis of 20 cases.

Authors:  Xueqiang Yan; Houfang Kuang; Zhenchuang Zhu; Haibin Wang; Jun Yang; Xufei Duan; Hongqiang Bian; Nannan Zheng; Xuyong Chen
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  A comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open emergent repair of perforated peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Daniel L Davenport; Walker R Ueland; Shyanie Kumar; Margaret Plymale; Andrew C Bernard; J Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Assessment of PULP score in predicting 30-day perforated duodenal ulcer morbidity, and comparison of its performance with Boey and ASA, a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tamer Saafan; Walid El Ansari; Omer Al-Yahri; Ammar Eleter; Hisham Eljohary; Rashad Alfkey; Mustafa Hajjar; Ali Toffaha; Abdelrahman El Osta
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-10

4.  Analysis of risk factors affecting the development of peptic ulcer perforation: case-control study.

Authors:  Sami Akbulut; Ali Riza Caliskan; Hasan Saritas; Khaled Demyati; Yilmaz Bilgic; Selver Unsal; Cemalettin Koc; Sezai Yilmaz
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-25

5.  Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease in a Tertiary Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Five Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Henok Teshome; Mekbib Birega; Mekdim Taddese
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.