Literature DB >> 9143574

Perforated peptic ulcer: long-term results after simple closure in the elderly.

L G Blomgren1.   

Abstract

The relative incidence of peptic ulcer perforation in the elderly is rising, and the optimal surgical treatment has yet to be defined. To evaluate the long-term result after simple closure a follow-up study was initiated at a Swedish community hospital. During 1983-1992 a total of 151 patients were admitted with perforated peptic ulcer; 92 were elderly (i.e., 70 years or older), 63 of whom were operated with simple closure. Mortality at 30 days was 27% (17/63) and the total in-hospital mortality 30% (19/63). After a mean follow-up of 79 months, 14 of the 44 survivors are still alive. So far only three of the survivors have required additional hospitalization for complications of peptic ulcer disease. Because the rate of serious recurrences is low (14%, 6/44), it is concluded that simple closure is an adequate surgical treatment for peptic ulcer perforation in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9143574     DOI: 10.1007/pl00012263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  21 in total

1.  Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Mario Testini; Piero Portincasa; Giuseppe Piccinni; Germana Lissidini; Fabio Pellegrini; Luigi Greco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing T Siu; Heng T Leong; Bonita K B Law; Chun H Chau; Anthony C N Li; Kai H Fung; Yuk P Tai; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.

Authors:  Kin Tong Chung; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

5.  Cost effective management of duodenal ulcers in Uganda: interventions based on a series of seven cases.

Authors:  Gabriel R Nzarubara
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  Impact of preoperative physiological risk profile on postoperative morbidity and mortality after emergency operation of complicated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Birte Summa; Ulrike Schulz; Clemens Schafmayer; Sebastian Hinz; Juergen Tepel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Perforated peptic ulcer in South India: an institutional perspective.

Authors:  Sankar Arveen; Sadasivan Jagdish; Dharanipragada Kadambari
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Management of the difficult duodenal stump in penetrating duodenal ulcer disease: a comparative analysis of duodenojejunostomy with "classical" stump closure (Nissen-Bsteh).

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Emre F Yekebas; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Kai Bachmann; Alexandra König; Asad Kutup; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Perforated peptic ulcer: main factors of morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Carlos Noguiera; António Sérgio Silva; Jorge Nunes Santos; António Gomes Silva; Joaquim Ferreira; Eduarda Matos; Hernani Vilaça
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.