Literature DB >> 16127525

Prognostic factors of peptic ulcer perforation.

Ibrahim Barut1, Omer R Tarhan, Celal Cerci, Nejda Karaguzel, Yusuf Akdeniz, Mahmut Bulbul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Today a perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a rare condition. However, emergency surgery for perforated ulcer presently carries a mortality risk of up to 30%. The aim of this study is to analyze and define factors influencing surgical prognosis in patients operated upon for PPU.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 62 patients treated for PPU in Suleyman Demirel University, Surgical Department between January 1995 to January 2004. Univariate analysis was performed to determine risk factors for mortality in PPU by chi-square test, Pearson and Spearman correlation tests using SPSS for Windows statistical software. We accepted statistical significance for p values <0.05.
RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 17.7%. The present study confirms the age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, coexisting medical disease, elapsed time from symptoms to operation, blood pressure, pulse, serum albumin and creatinine levels, hemoglobin level and diameter of perforation as valid prognostic factors in whole series, whereas a previous history of peptic ulcer disease, chronic ingestion history of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alcohol ingestion, smoking habits, site of perforation, type of surgical treatment (simple suture or resection), postoperative complications did not appear to be related to prognosis.
CONCLUSION: Age, gender, ASA classification, coexisting medical disease, elapsed time from symptoms to operation, blood pressure, pulse, serum albumin and creatinine levels, hemoglobin level and diameter of perforation are factors significantly associated with fatal outcomes in patients undergoing emergency surgery for PPU. Thus, such factors need to be carefully taken into account during the general workup of patients admitted for PPU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16127525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Med J        ISSN: 0379-5284            Impact factor:   1.484


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in peptic ulcer perforations: a retrospective 14-year study.

Authors:  Mutlu Unver; Özgür Fırat; Ömer Vedat Ünalp; Alper Uğuz; Tufan Gümüş; Taylan Özgür Sezer; Şafak Öztürk; Tayfun Yoldaş; Sinan Ersin; Adem Güler
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

2.  Perforated peptic ulcer in South India: an institutional perspective.

Authors:  Sankar Arveen; Sadasivan Jagdish; Dharanipragada Kadambari
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  A review of the management of perforated duodenal ulcers at a tertiary hospital in south western Nigeria.

Authors:  A C Etonyeaku; E A Agbakwuru; A A Akinkuolie; C A Omotola; A O Talabi; C U Onyia; O A Kolawole; O A Aladesuru
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Prognostic Factors and Complications in Patients With Operational Peptic Ulcer Perforation in Northern Thailand.

Authors:  Chutikarn Suriya; Nongyao Kasatpibal; Wipada Kunaviktikul; Toranee Kayee
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2014-03-14

5.  Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on rates of emergency department utilization and hospital admission due to general surgery conditions.

Authors:  Saba Balvardi; Josie Cipolla; Nawar Touma; Tharaniya Vallipuram; Natasha Barone; Reginold Sivarajan; Pepa Kaneva; Sebastian Demyttenaere; Marylise Boutros; Lawrence Lee; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 6.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.