Literature DB >> 18246235

Management of perforated peptic ulcer in patients at a teaching hospital.

Ali K Bin-Taleb1, Riyadh A Razzaq, Zaki O Al-Kathiri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore and analyze the current status in management of patients with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU).
METHODS: A retrospective study carried out at the Surgical Department, Al-Gamhouria Teaching Hospital, Aden, Yemen. Patients admitted with perforated benign peptic ulcers from January 1997 to December 2006 were included in the study.
RESULTS: A total of 156 patients, 138 (88.5%) male and 18 (11.5%) female, with an overall mean age of 39.08 years (range 14-75 years) and a higher frequency of PPU was noted in patients 21-40 years (58.3%). The perforated duodenal ulcer and perforated gastric ulcer ratio was 4.38:1. The mean time of presentation was 16.5 hours, and operative intervention after admission was 5.25 hours. Simple perforation closure was used in 91.7% of the patients. Postoperative complication rate was 41% (statistically significant in cases admitted later than 12 hours), wound sepsis making the majority at 55.2%, 6 deaths (3.9%), the correlation with presentation time was not significant. The overall mean post-operative hospitalization period was 12.76 days; 14.7% of the patients stayed more than 3 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Younger patients (21-40 years) were frequently affected. Emphasis should be placed on shortening the time to surgery. Simple closure remains the selected treatment in the majority of patients. Overall post-operative mortality was low (3.9%). Improving the surgical skills, wound care, administrative regulations, hospital environment, and equipment are needed to reduce the high rate of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18246235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Med J        ISSN: 0379-5284            Impact factor:   1.484


  6 in total

1.  Perforated peptic ulcer in South India: an institutional perspective.

Authors:  Sankar Arveen; Sadasivan Jagdish; Dharanipragada Kadambari
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  A review of the management of perforated duodenal ulcers at a tertiary hospital in south western Nigeria.

Authors:  A C Etonyeaku; E A Agbakwuru; A A Akinkuolie; C A Omotola; A O Talabi; C U Onyia; O A Kolawole; O A Aladesuru
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Perforated duodenal ulcer; management in a resource poor, semi-urban nigerian hospital.

Authors:  Felix O Oribabor; Bamidele O Adebayo; Tunde Aladesanmi; David O Akinola
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2013-01

Review 4.  Perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kenneth Thorsen; Ewen M Harrison; Juliane Bingener; Morten H Møller; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Prognostic Factors and Complications in Patients With Operational Peptic Ulcer Perforation in Northern Thailand.

Authors:  Chutikarn Suriya; Nongyao Kasatpibal; Wipada Kunaviktikul; Toranee Kayee
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2014-03-14

Review 6.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.