Literature DB >> 19504129

Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.

Werner Schmoelz1, U Onder, A Martin, A von Strempel.   

Abstract

In advanced stages of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine instrumented spondylodesis is still the golden standard treatment. However, in recent years dynamic stabilisation devices are being implanted to treat the segmental instability due to iatrogenic decompression or segmental degeneration. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the stabilising effect of a classical pedicle screw/rod combination, with a moveable hinge joint connection between the screw and rod allowing one degree of freedom (cosmicMIA). Six human lumbar spines (L2-5) were loaded in a spine tester with pure moments of +/-7.5 Nm in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation. The range of motion (ROM) and the neutral zone were determined for the following states: (1) intact, (2) monosegmental dynamic instrumentation (L4-5), (3) bisegmental dynamic instrumentation (L3-5), (4) bisegmental decompression (L3-5), (5) bisegmental dynamic instrumentation (L3-5) and (6) bisegmental rigid instrumentation (L3-5). Compared to the intact, with monosegmental instrumentation (2) the ROM of the treated segment was reduced to 47, 40 and 77% in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation, respectively. Bisegmental dynamic instrumentation (3) further reduced the ROM in L4-5 compared to monosegmental instrumentation to 25% (lateral bending), 28% (flexion/extension) and 57% (axial rotation). Bisegmental surgical decompression (4) caused an increase in ROM in both segments (L3-4 and L4-5) to approximately 125% and approximately 135% and 187-234% in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation, respectively. Compared to the intact state, bisegmental dynamic instrumentation after surgical decompression reduced the ROM of the two-bridged segments to 29-35% in lateral bending and 33-38% in flexion/extension. In axial rotation, the ROM was in the range of the intact specimen (87-117%). A rigid instrumentation (6) further reduced the ROM of the two-bridged segments to 20-30, 23-27 and 50-68% in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation, respectively. The results of the present study showed that compared to the intact specimen the investigated hinged dynamic stabilisation device reduced the ROM after bisegmental decompression in lateral bending and flexion/extension. Following bisegmental decompression and the thereby caused large rotational instability the device is capable of restoring the motion in axial rotation back to values in the range of the intact motion segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19504129      PMCID: PMC2899377          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1052-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  Stability analysis of an enhanced load sharing posterior fixation device and its equivalent conventional device in a calf spine model.

Authors:  J L Scifert; K Sairyo; V K Goel; L J Grobler; N M Grosland; K F Spratt; K D Chesmel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Three-dimensional motion analysis with Synex. Comparative biomechanical test series with a new vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  C Knop; U Lange; L Bastian; M Blauth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics.

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; C Klöckner; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment.

Authors:  W Schmoelz; J F Huber; T Nydegger; L Claes; H J Wilke
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

5.  Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Gary Ghiselli; Jeffrey C Wang; Nitin N Bhatia; Wellington K Hsu; Edgar G Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A biomechanical comparison of supplementary posterior translaminar facet and transfacetopedicular screw fixation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Sung-Min Kim; T Jesse Lim; Josemaria Paterno; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-07

7.  Use of instrumented pedicle screws to evaluate load sharing in posterior dynamic stabilization systems.

Authors:  Kathleen Meyers; Michael Tauber; Yuri Sudin; Shai Fleischer; Uri Arnin; Federico Girardi; Timothy Wright
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  The relevance of torsion to the mechanical derangement of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M A Adams; W C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system.

Authors:  Thomas M Stoll; Gilles Dubois; Othmar Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Fujiwara; T H Lim; H S An; N Tanaka; C H Jeon; G B Andersson; V M Haughton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  15 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of a posterior non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Stefanie Erhart; Stefan Unger; Alexander C Disch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Pedicle screw-based systems for dynamic stabilization : An insight into the philosophy, technique, indications and success of these systems].

Authors:  J Richolt; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Schilling; S Krüger; T M Grupp; G N Duda; W Blömer; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Dynamic posterior stabilization with the cosmic system].

Authors:  Archibald von Strempel
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Computer simulation and image guidance for individualised dynamic spinal stabilization.

Authors:  S R Kantelhardt; U Hausen; M Kosterhon; A N Amr; K Gruber; A Giese
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Werner Schmoelz; Juliane Zenner; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl; Davud Malekzadeh; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Martina Blocher; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Minimum two-year follow-up of cases with recurrent disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-24

8.  Quantifying intervertebral disc mechanics: a new definition of the neutral zone.

Authors:  Theodoor H Smit; Manon Slm van Tunen; Albert J van der Veen; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Dynamic stabilization for challenging lumbar degenerative diseases of the spine: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-15

10.  Posterior Transpedicular Dynamic Stabilization versus Total Disc Replacement in the Treatment of Lumbar Painful Degenerative Disc Disease: A Comparison of Clinical Results.

Authors:  Tunc Oktenoglu; Ali Fahir Ozer; Mehdi Sasani; Yaprak Ataker; Cengiz Gomleksiz; Irfan Celebi
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.