Literature DB >> 15252099

Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine.

Gary Ghiselli1, Jeffrey C Wang, Nitin N Bhatia, Wellington K Hsu, Edgar G Dawson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A primary concern after posterior lumbar spine arthrodesis is the potential for adjacent segment degeneration cephalad or caudad to the fusion segment. There is controversy regarding the subsequent degeneration of adjacent segments, and we are aware of no long-term studies that have analyzed both cephalad and caudad degeneration following posterior arthrodesis. A retrospective investigation was performed to determine the rates of degeneration and survival of the motion segments adjacent to the site of a posterior lumbar fusion.
METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen patients who had undergone posterior lumbar arthrodesis were included in this study. The study group included 126 female patients and eighty-nine male patients. The average duration of follow-up was 6.7 years. Radiographs were analyzed with regard to arthritic degeneration at the adjacent levels both preoperatively and at the time of the last follow-up visit. Disc spaces were graded on a 4-point arthritic degeneration scale. Correlation analysis was used to determine the contribution of independent variables to the rate of degeneration. Survivorship analysis was performed to describe the degeneration of the adjacent motion segments.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine (27.4%) of the 215 patients had evidence of degeneration at the adjacent levels and elected to have an additional decompression (fifteen patients) or arthrodesis (forty-four patients). Kaplan-Meier analysis predicted a disease-free survival rate of 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 77.5% to 89.5%) at five years and of 63.9% (95% confidence interval, 54.0% to 73.8%) at ten years after the index operation. Although there was a trend toward progression of the arthritic grade at the adjacent disc levels, there was no significant correlation, with the numbers available, between the preoperative arthritic grade and the need for additional surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of symptomatic degeneration at an adjacent segment warranting either decompression or arthrodesis was predicted to be 16.5% at five years and 36.1% at ten years. There appeared to be no correlation with the length of fusion or the preoperative arthritic degeneration of the adjacent segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15252099     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200407000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  168 in total

1.  Injectable silk fibroin/polyurethane composite hydrogel for nucleus pulposus replacement.

Authors:  Jingen Hu; Bin Chen; Fang Guo; Jingyu Du; Pengcheng Gu; Xiangjin Lin; Weiping Yang; Hailong Zhang; Min Lu; Yiping Huang; Gewen Xu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Intraoperative determination of the load–displacement behavior of scoliotic spinal motion segments: preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Christoph Reutlinger; Carol Hasler; Klaus Scheffler; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Stephan Tohtz; Eike Hoff; Christian Gross; Carsten Perka; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Yi Shen et al. concerning "Risk factors for adjacent segment pathology requiring additional surgery after single-level spinal fusion: impact of pre-existing spinal stenosis demonstrated by preoperative myelography" by I. Yugué et al. (2015) Eur Spine J Aug 14 doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4291-5.

Authors:  Itaru Yugue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

7.  Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Semirigid (WavefleX) and Rigid System for the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Do-Keun Kim; Hyunkeun Lim; Dae Cheol Rim; Chang Hyun Oh
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-06-30

8.  Changes in the adjacent segment 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Hyeong-Ki Shim; Yong Ahn; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [Adjacent segment movement after monosegmental total disc replacement and monosegmental fusion of segments L4/5].

Authors:  M Däxle; T Kocak; F Lattig; H Reichel; B Cakir
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Lumbar disc degeneration below a long arthrodesis (performed for scoliosis in adults) to L4 or L5.

Authors:  Ian J Harding; Sebastian Charosky; Raphael Vialle; Daniel H Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.