Literature DB >> 21153013

[Dynamic posterior stabilization with the cosmic system].

Archibald von Strempel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Stabilization of unstable motion segments with a stable but non-rigid implant system without an additional spondylodesis. INDICATIONS: Neurogenic claudication with instability; discogenic pain; in combination with a fusion (hybrid technique); elongation of a preexisting fusion; second recurrence of a herniated disk. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Increased instability; correction and reduction; instrumentation of more than three levels. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Muscle-sparing approach to the posterior lumbar spine under anteroposterior and lateral image control. Use of special instruments with a slotted sleeve connected to the screw head for rod implantation. Alternatively: conventional midline approach with detachment of muscles from the posterior spine. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Mobilization on the day after surgery. Limited physical activities and no work load for 6 weeks.
RESULTS: In 139 patients (77 females, 62 males, average age 55 years) with a follow-up of 2 years, Oswestry score improved from 49.0% preoperatively to 22.5% and VAS (visual analog scale) from 7.3 preoperatively to 2.5 after 2 years. No change of the lordosis. Eleven revisions (7.9%). Two broken screws (0.3%) and 17 screws (2.5%) with a radiolucent halo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153013     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-9016-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  5 in total

1.  Stability analysis of an enhanced load sharing posterior fixation device and its equivalent conventional device in a calf spine model.

Authors:  J L Scifert; K Sairyo; V K Goel; L J Grobler; N M Grosland; K F Spratt; K D Chesmel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note.

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Toshihiko Hosoya; Tateru Shiraishi; Morio Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-11

3.  Hydroxyapatite coating improves fixation of pedicle screws. A clinical study.

Authors:  B Sandén; C Olerud; M Petrén-Mallmin; S Larsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

4.  Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; U Onder; A Martin; A von Strempel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Stability of pedicle screws. 2: Maximum pullout force with reference to bone density].

Authors:  A von Strempel; J Kühle; W Plitz
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb
  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  [Spinal column: implants and revisions].

Authors:  S M Krieg; H S Meyer; B Meyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  [Operative options for failed back surgery syndrome].

Authors:  S M Krieg; B Meyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Does the Addition of a Dynamic Pedicle Screw to a Fusion Segment Prevent Adjacent Segment Pathology in the Lumbar Spine?

Authors:  Hayati Aygun; Osman Yaray; Muren Mutlu
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-10-11

4.  Dynamic stabilization for degenerative diseases in the lumbar spine: 2 years results.

Authors:  Ahmed Hosny Khalifa; Timo Stübig; Oliver Meier; Christian Walter Müller
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2018-04-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.