Literature DB >> 19503826

Integrating statistical predictions and experimental verifications for enhancing protein-chemical interaction predictions in virtual screening.

Nobuyoshi Nagamine1, Takayuki Shirakawa, Yusuke Minato, Kentaro Torii, Hiroki Kobayashi, Masaya Imoto, Yasubumi Sakakibara.   

Abstract

Predictions of interactions between target proteins and potential leads are of great benefit in the drug discovery process. We present a comprehensively applicable statistical prediction method for interactions between any proteins and chemical compounds, which requires only protein sequence data and chemical structure data and utilizes the statistical learning method of support vector machines. In order to realize reasonable comprehensive predictions which can involve many false positives, we propose two approaches for reduction of false positives: (i) efficient use of multiple statistical prediction models in the framework of two-layer SVM and (ii) reasonable design of the negative data to construct statistical prediction models. In two-layer SVM, outputs produced by the first-layer SVM models, which are constructed with different negative samples and reflect different aspects of classifications, are utilized as inputs to the second-layer SVM. In order to design negative data which produce fewer false positive predictions, we iteratively construct SVM models or classification boundaries from positive and tentative negative samples and select additional negative sample candidates according to pre-determined rules. Moreover, in order to fully utilize the advantages of statistical learning methods, we propose a strategy to effectively feedback experimental results to computational predictions with consideration of biological effects of interest. We show the usefulness of our approach in predicting potential ligands binding to human androgen receptors from more than 19 million chemical compounds and verifying these predictions by in vitro binding. Moreover, we utilize this experimental validation as feedback to enhance subsequent computational predictions, and experimentally validate these predictions again. This efficient procedure of the iteration of the in silico prediction and in vitro or in vivo experimental verifications with the sufficient feedback enabled us to identify novel ligand candidates which were distant from known ligands in the chemical space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19503826      PMCID: PMC2685987          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  27 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Drug design strategies for targeting G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Thomas Klabunde; Gerhard Hessler
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 3.164

3.  Effect of molecular descriptor feature selection in support vector machine classification of pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of chemical agents.

Authors:  Y Xue; Z R Li; C W Yap; L Z Sun; X Chen; Y Z Chen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

4.  Prediction of HIV-1 protease inhibitor resistance using a protein-inhibitor flexible docking approach.

Authors:  Ekachai Jenwitheesuk; Ram Samudrala
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2005

5.  Antidiabetic activity of passive nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor modulators.

Authors:  J T Link; Bryan Sorensen; Jyoti Patel; Marlena Grynfarb; Annika Goos-Nilsson; Jiahong Wang; Steven Fung; Denise Wilcox; Brad Zinker; Phong Nguyen; Bach Hickman; James M Schmidt; Sue Swanson; Zhenping Tian; Thomas J Reisch; Gary Rotert; Jia Du; Benjamin Lane; Thomas W von Geldern; Peer B Jacobson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Interaction model based on local protein substructures generalizes to the entire structural enzyme-ligand space.

Authors:  Helena Strömbergsson; Pawel Daniluk; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; Jarl E S Wikberg; Gerard J Kleywegt; Torgeir R Hvidsten
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The effect of anabolic-androgenic steroids on aromatase activity and androgen receptor binding in the rat preoptic area.

Authors:  C E Roselli
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-05-11       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Mass spectrometric characterization of the human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain expressed in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Z Zhu; R R Becklin; D M Desiderio; J T Dalton
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Cimetidine, a histamine H2 receptor antagonist, occupies androgen receptors.

Authors:  J W Funder; J E Mercer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  FacPad: Bayesian sparse factor modeling for the inference of pathways responsive to drug treatment.

Authors:  Haisu Ma; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Enabling the hypothesis-driven prioritization of ligand candidates in big databases: Screenlamp and its application to GPCR inhibitor discovery for invasive species control.

Authors:  Sebastian Raschka; Anne M Scott; Nan Liu; Santosh Gunturu; Mar Huertas; Weiming Li; Leslie A Kuhn
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A Drug-Side Effect Context-Sensitive Network approach for drug target prediction.

Authors:  Mengshi Zhou; Yang Chen; Rong Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Predicting drug-target interaction networks based on functional groups and biological features.

Authors:  Zhisong He; Jian Zhang; Xiao-He Shi; Le-Le Hu; Xiangyin Kong; Yu-Dong Cai; Kuo-Chen Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Systematic analysis of genome-wide fitness data in yeast reveals novel gene function and drug action.

Authors:  Maureen E Hillenmeyer; Elke Ericson; Ronald W Davis; Corey Nislow; Daphne Koller; Guri Giaever
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  The Mycobacterium tuberculosis drugome and its polypharmacological implications.

Authors:  Sarah L Kinnings; Li Xie; Kingston H Fung; Richard M Jackson; Lei Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  PubChem applications in drug discovery: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Yongmei Pan; Ming Hao; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 9.  Drug target inference through pathway analysis of genomics data.

Authors:  Haisu Ma; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  Improving drug response prediction by integrating multiple data sources: matrix factorization, kernel and network-based approaches.

Authors:  Betül Güvenç Paltun; Hiroshi Mamitsuka; Samuel Kaski
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 11.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.