Literature DB >> 29383467

Enabling the hypothesis-driven prioritization of ligand candidates in big databases: Screenlamp and its application to GPCR inhibitor discovery for invasive species control.

Sebastian Raschka1, Anne M Scott2, Nan Liu1,3,4, Santosh Gunturu1, Mar Huertas2,5, Weiming Li2, Leslie A Kuhn6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

While the advantage of screening vast databases of molecules to cover greater molecular diversity is often mentioned, in reality, only a few studies have been published demonstrating inhibitor discovery by screening more than a million compounds for features that mimic a known three-dimensional (3D) ligand. Two factors contribute: the general difficulty of discovering potent inhibitors, and the lack of free, user-friendly software to incorporate project-specific knowledge and user hypotheses into 3D ligand-based screening. The Screenlamp modular toolkit presented here was developed with these needs in mind. We show Screenlamp's ability to screen more than 12 million commercially available molecules and identify potent in vivo inhibitors of a G protein-coupled bile acid receptor within the first year of a discovery project. This pheromone receptor governs sea lamprey reproductive behavior, and to our knowledge, this project is the first to establish the efficacy of computational screening in discovering lead compounds for aquatic invasive species control. Significant enhancement in activity came from selecting compounds based on one of the hypotheses: that matching two distal oxygen groups in the 3D structure of the pheromone is crucial for activity. Six of the 15 most active compounds met these criteria. A second hypothesis-that presence of an alkyl sulfate side chain results in high activity-identified another 6 compounds in the top 10, demonstrating the significant benefits of hypothesis-driven screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoinformatics; Computer-aided molecular design; G protein-coupled receptor; Structure based drug discovery; Structure–activity relationships; Virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29383467     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0100-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  69 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  PHASE: a new engine for pharmacophore perception, 3D QSAR model development, and 3D database screening: 1. Methodology and preliminary results.

Authors:  Steven L Dixon; Alexander M Smondyrev; Eric H Knoll; Shashidhar N Rao; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays.

Authors:  Jonathan B Baell; Georgina A Holloway
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 7.  The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Daniel M Rosenbaum; Søren G F Rasmussen; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Activation and allosteric modulation of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Aaron M Ring; Aashish Manglik; Jianxin Hu; Kelly Hu; Katrin Eitel; Harald Hübner; Els Pardon; Celine Valant; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos; Christian C Felder; Peter Gmeiner; Jan Steyaert; William I Weis; K Christopher Garcia; Jürgen Wess; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The olfactory system of migratory adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) is specifically and acutely sensitive to unique bile acids released by conspecific larvae.

Authors:  W Li; P W Sorensen; D D Gallaher
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Machine learning methods in chemoinformatics.

Authors:  John B O Mitchell
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2014-09-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Behavioral Responses of Sea Lamprey to Varying Application Rates of a Synthesized Pheromone in Diverse Trapping Scenarios.

Authors:  Nicholas S Johnson; Sean A Lewandoski; Bethany J Alger; Lisa O'Connor; Gale Bravener; Peter Hrodey; Belinda Huerta; Jessica Barber; Weiming Li; C Michael Wagner; Michael J Siefkes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  A pheromone antagonist liberates female sea lamprey from a sensory trap to enable reliable communication.

Authors:  Tyler J Buchinger; Anne M Scott; Skye D Fissette; Cory O Brant; Mar Huertas; Ke Li; Nicholas S Johnson; Weiming Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.