Literature DB >> 18937438

Interaction model based on local protein substructures generalizes to the entire structural enzyme-ligand space.

Helena Strömbergsson1, Pawel Daniluk, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Krzysztof Fidelis, Jarl E S Wikberg, Gerard J Kleywegt, Torgeir R Hvidsten.   

Abstract

Chemogenomics is a new strategy in in silico drug discovery, where the ultimate goal is to understand molecular recognition for all molecules interacting with all proteins in the proteome. To study such cross interactions, methods that can generalize over proteins that vary greatly in sequence, structure, and function are needed. We present a general quantitative approach to protein-ligand binding affinity prediction that spans the entire structural enzyme-ligand space. The model was trained on a data set composed of all available enzymes cocrystallized with druglike ligands, taken from four publicly available interaction databases, for which a crystal structure is available. Each enzyme was characterized by a set of local descriptors of protein structure that describe the binding site of the cocrystallized ligand. The ligands in the training set were described by traditional QSAR descriptors. To evaluate the model, a comprehensive test set consisting of enzyme structures and ligands was manually curated. The test set contained enzyme-ligand complexes for which no crystal structures were available, and thus the binding modes were unknown. The test set enzymes were therefore characterized by matching their entire structures to the local descriptor library constructed from the training set. Both the training and the test set contained enzyme-ligand complexes from all major enzyme classes, and the enzymes spanned a large range of sequences and folds. The experimental binding affinities (p K i) ranged from 0.5 to 11.9 (0.7-11.0 in the test set). The induced model predicted the binding affinities of the external test set enzyme-ligand complexes with an r (2) of 0.53 and an RMSEP of 1.5. This demonstrates that the use of local descriptors makes it possible to create rough predictive models that can generalize over a wide range of protein targets.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18937438     DOI: 10.1021/ci800200e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  12 in total

1.  Integrating statistical predictions and experimental verifications for enhancing protein-chemical interaction predictions in virtual screening.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Nagamine; Takayuki Shirakawa; Yusuke Minato; Kentaro Torii; Hiroki Kobayashi; Masaya Imoto; Yasubumi Sakakibara
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Proteochemometric modeling of the antigen-antibody interaction: new fingerprints for antigen, antibody and epitope-paratope interaction.

Authors:  Tianyi Qiu; Han Xiao; Qingchen Zhang; Jingxuan Qiu; Yiyan Yang; Dingfeng Wu; Zhiwei Cao; Ruixin Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Computational chemogenomics: is it more than inductive transfer?

Authors:  J B Brown; Yasushi Okuno; Gilles Marcou; Alexandre Varnek; Dragos Horvath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Binding affinity prediction with property-encoded shape distribution signatures.

Authors:  Sourav Das; Michael P Krein; Curt M Breneman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  A novel method to compare protein structures using local descriptors.

Authors:  Paweł Daniluk; Bogdan Lesyng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Benchmarking of protein descriptor sets in proteochemometric modeling (part 1): comparative study of 13 amino acid descriptor sets.

Authors:  Gerard Jp van Westen; Remco F Swier; Jörg K Wegner; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Herman Wt van Vlijmen; Andreas Bender
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.514

7.  Benchmarking of protein descriptor sets in proteochemometric modeling (part 2): modeling performance of 13 amino acid descriptor sets.

Authors:  Gerard Jp van Westen; Remco F Swier; Isidro Cortes-Ciriano; Jörg K Wegner; John P Overington; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Herman Wt van Vlijmen; Andreas Bender
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 5.514

8.  Proteochemometric modeling of the bioactivity spectra of HIV-1 protease inhibitors by introducing protein-ligand interaction fingerprint.

Authors:  Qi Huang; Haixiao Jin; Qi Liu; Qiong Wu; Hong Kang; Zhiwei Cao; Ruixin Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Screening of selective histone deacetylase inhibitors by proteochemometric modeling.

Authors:  Dingfeng Wu; Qi Huang; Yida Zhang; Qingchen Zhang; Qi Liu; Jun Gao; Zhiwei Cao; Ruixin Zhu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A chemogenomics view on protein-ligand spaces.

Authors:  Helena Strömbergsson; Gerard J Kleywegt
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.